Cited by 20Youth Development and Social SupportMentoring and Academic DevelopmentOutdoor and Experiential Education

How to support me in connected learning: Youth perspectives on adult supportive behavior and its benefits

Vaclavik, Danielle, Sánchez, Bernadette, Buehler, Kathleen, Gray, Tené, Rodriguez, Elsa·2017·Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

This study examined the various ways adults engage and support youth in connected learning settings, which are focused on supporting youth in their interests or passions. Youth from 5 Chicago community-based, out-of-school time (OST) programs participated in focus groups on the topic of adult–youth relationships. Participants reported characteristics and behaviors of supportive adults as well as the outcomes associated with those behaviors. Analyses revealed that the following characteristics of adults enabled engagement and relationship development: (a) mutual respect, (b) genuine interest, (c) ongoing communication and friendship, and (d) going above and beyond. Youth also identified the specific ways that adults supported them: (a) guidance and motivation, (b) skill-based support, (c) role modeling, (d) connecting, (e) emotional support, and (f) cultivating youth voice. Finally, participants reported the following outcomes related to such support: (a) social capital, (b) a sense of empowerment and control of their futures, and (c) a sense of acceptance and validation. This study is a contribution to the literature on adult–youth relationships in connected learning sites and draws attention to the potential socioemotional and instructional benefits of such programs. Our study also highlights the various ways that adults in OST programs can successfully engage youth and form relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcop.21901

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The emotional component also encompasses other qualities, such as listening, empathy, attunement, genuine respect, and sensitivity.

    “The emotional component also encompasses other qualities, such as listening, empathy, attunement [62,96,97,98], genuine respect [99], and sensitivity [39,94,100].”
  • The recreational component refers to connectedness, companionship, friendship, and ongoing communication, accompanied by collaboration, mutuality, and self-disclosure.

    “The recreational component refers to connectedness, companionship, friendship, and ongoing communication [80,82,91,92,94,96,97,98,99,103,104], accompanied by collaboration, mutuality [39,86,94,95,96,103,105], and self-disclosure [106,107].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaclavik, D., Sánchez, B., Buehler, K., Gray, T., & Rodriguez, E.
Affiliations
  • DePaul University (US)
  • Digital Youth Network
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Vaclavik, Danielle
Venue
Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-18
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
906-921
ISSN
0090-4392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2738403212
Cited by
20
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Chicago Community Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Outdoor and Experiential Education
Keywords
connected learning, adult-youth relationships, adult support, out-of-school time programs, youth perspectives, mutual respect, role modeling, emotional support, youth voice, social capital, empowerment, youth participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review