The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Erythroid colony formation in cultures of mouse and human bone marrow: Analysis of the requirement for erythropoietin by gel filtration and affinity chromatography on agarose‐concanavalin A
Abstract
Assay of red cell progenitors by colony formation in culture is expected to allow study of early events in erythroid differentiation in animal models and in man. In this communication, a simplification of the culture method for mouse bone marrow cells originally reported by Stephenson et al. ('71) is described. In the modified procedure, plasma clot is replaced by methyl cellulose, and scoring of erythroid colonies is done directly in the plates without staining. With additional modification the system proved applicable to the culture of erythroid colonies from human bone marrow as well. The development of both mouse and human erythroid colonies was dependent on “erythroid colony stimulating activity” (E‐CSA) supplied by extracts of anemic sheep plasma, or by extracts of urine from anemic patients. Over a certain range, the number of colonies was a function of dose of E‐CSA. In addition to E‐CSA, these extracts also possessed erythropoietin activity as measured in plethoric mice. The possible chemical equivalence of urinary E‐CSA and erythropoietin was suggested by their similar behavior on both gel filtration and affinity chromatography on agarose‐concanavalin A. The finding further suggests that the culture method might prove useful for the bioassay of erythropoietin. Granulocyte colony stimulating activity (G‐CSA) was also present in the urine extracts, as detected in cultures of mouse bone marrow. Virtually all of this activity was bound on agarose‐con A, whereas only a small fraction of E‐CSA was retained on this material. Agarose‐con A may thus be useful for the purification of erythropoietin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Krantz, S. (1991) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v77.3.419.419 · Cited by 855
Yamaguchi, Y., Hayashi, Y., Sugama, Y., Miura, Y., Kasahara, T., Kitamura, S., Torisu, M., Mita, S., Tominaga, A., & Takatsu, K. (1988) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.167.5.1737 · Cited by 608
Characterization of murine CD34, a marker for hematopoietic progenitor and stem cells
Krause, D., Ito, T., Fackler, M., Smith, O., Collector, M., Sharkis, S., & May, W. (1994) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v84.3.691.691 · Cited by 290
Moriyama, Y., & Fisher, J. (1975) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v45.5.665.665 · Cited by 100
Okada, S., Wang, Z.-Q., Grigoriadis, A. E., Wagner, E. F., & von Rüden, T. (1994) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.14.1.382-390.1994 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Iscove, N. N., Sieber, F., & Winterhalter, K. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Cellular Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1974-04
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 309-320
- ISSN
- 0021-9541 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4652
- OpenAlex
- W2154037033
- Cited by
- 822
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Erythroid colony formation in cultures of mouse and human bone marrow: Analysis of the requirement for erythropoietin by gel filtration and affinity chromatography on agarose‐concanavalin A. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcp.1040830218
- The paper
- Iscove, N. N., Sieber, F., & Winterhalter, K. H. (1974). Erythroid colony formation in cultures of mouse and human bone marrow: Analysis of the requirement for erythropoietin by gel filtration and affinity chromatography on agarose‐concanavalin A. Journal of Cellular Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1040830218
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.