Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of the biological actions of TGF beta‐1 and TGF beta‐2: Differential activity in endothelial cells

Jennings, John C., Mohan, Subburaman, Linkhart, Thomas A., Widstrom, Richard, Baylink, David J.·1988·Journal of Cellular Physiology

Abstract

Beta transforming growth factor (TGF beta) has multiple in vitro biological effects including stimulation or inhibition of proliferation of specific cell types. A second major form of TGF beta, TGF beta‐2, has recently been isolated from porcine platelets, from bovine bone matrix, and from several other sources. The two forms of TGF beta are biologically equipotent with the exception that TGF beta‐2 was much less active than TGF beta‐1 for inhibition of proliferation of a rat pleuripotent hematopoietic stem cell line. During the purification of beta TGF from bone, we obtained two fraction pools that differed in their ability to inhibit 3 H‐thymidine incorporation into aortic endothelial cells (AEC). We therefore compared highly purified TGF beta‐1 and TGF beta‐2 isolated from porcine platelets for inhibition of DNA synthesis in mink lung epithelial cells (MvlLu), and in AEC, and for stimulation of 3 H‐thymidine incorporation in calvarial bone cells (CBC) in 3 experiments. TGF beta‐1 and TGF beta‐2 inhibited cell proliferation in MvlLu with no significant differences in the ED 50 (31± 8pg/ml vs 23± 7). TGF beta‐2 was much less potent than TGF beta‐1 in inhibiting DNA synthesis in AEC (6310 ± 985 pg/ml vs 101 ± 34). The reduced specific activity of TGF beta‐2 was also observed in adrenal capillary endothelial cells. Both beta‐1 and beta‐2 stimulated proliferation of CBC (ED 50 26 ± 2 pg/ml vs 10 ± 4). We also examined the specificity of the MvlLu and AEC inhibition assays. Epidermal growth factor (EGF), platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), acidic and basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF), skeletal growth factor (SGF)/insulin‐like growth factor‐II (IGF‐II), and insulin‐like growth factor‐I (IGF‐I) did not inhibit DNA synthesis in either assay system. However, when the growth factors were added to maximal inhibiting concentrations of TGF beta‐1, both acidic and basic FGF significantly reduced TGF beta‐1 inhibition in AEC. We conclude that (1) inhibition of DNA synthesis in endothelial cells is relatively specific for TGF beta‐1, (2) inhibition of DNA synthesis in MvlLu is a sensitive and specific assay for generic TGF beta activity but does not distinguish beta‐1 from beta‐2, (3) the relative inhibition of DNA synthesis in MvlLu and AEC may provide a means to quantitatively estimate TGF beta‐1 and TGF beta‐2, and (4) both TGF beta‐1 ad TGF beta‐2 are potent mitogens for chicken embryonic calvarial bone cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcp.1041370120

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Jennings, J. C., Mohan, S., Linkhart, T. A., Widstrom, R., & Baylink, D. J.
Venue
Journal of Cellular Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-10
Volume
137
Issue
1
Pages
167-172
ISSN
  • 0021-9541 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4652
OpenAlex
W1967780336
Cited by
191
References
0
FWCI
7.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the biological actions of TGF beta‐1 and TGF beta‐2: Differential activity in endothelial cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcp.1041370120
The paper
Jennings, J. C., Mohan, S., Linkhart, T. A., Widstrom, R., & Baylink, D. J. (1988). Comparison of the biological actions of TGF beta‐1 and TGF beta‐2: Differential activity in endothelial cells. Journal of Cellular Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1041370120

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.