Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 523

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of increased basement membrane invasiveness with absence of estrogen receptor and expression of vimentin in human breast cancer cell lines

Thompson, Erik W., Paik, Soonmyoung, Brünner, Nils, Sommers, Connie L., Zugmaier, Gerhard, Clarke, Robert, Shima, Thomas B., Torri, Jeffrey, Donahue, Steven, Lippman, Marc E., Martin, George R., Dickson, Robert B.·1992·Journal of Cellular Physiology

Abstract

Lack of estrogen receptor (ER) and presence of vimentin (VIM) associate with poor prognosis in human breast cancer. We have explored the relationships between ER, VIM, and invasiveness in human breast cancer cell lines. In the matrigel outgrowth assay, ER+/VIM‐ (MCF‐7, T47D, ZR‐75‐1), and ER‐/VIM‐ (MDA‐MB‐468, SK‐Br‐3) cell lines were uninvasive, while ER‐/VIM+ (BT549, MDA‐MB‐231, MDA‐MB‐435, MDA‐MB‐436, Hs578T) lines formed invasive, penetrating colonies. Similarly, ER‐/VIM+ cell lines were significantly more invasive than either the ER+/VIM‐ or ER‐/VIM‐ cell lines in the Boyden chamber chemoinvasion assay. Invasive activity in nude mice was only seen with ER‐/VIM+ cell lines MDA‐MB‐231, MDA‐MB‐435 and MDA‐MB‐436. Hs578T cells (ER‐/VIM +) showed hematogenous dissemination to the lungs in one of five mice, but lacked local invasion. The ER‐/VIM+ MCF‐7 ADR subline was significantly more active than the MCF‐7 cells in vitro, but resembled the wild‐type MCF‐7 parent in in vivo activity. Data from these cell lines suggest that human breast cancer progression results first in the loss of ER, and subsequently in VIM acquisition, the latter being associated with increased metastatic potential through enhanced invasiveness. The MCF‐7 ADR data provide evidence that this transition can occur in human breast cancer cells. Vimentin expression may provide useful insights into mechanisms of invasion and/or breast cancer cell progression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcp.1041500314

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 523

Metadata

Authors
Thompson, E. W., Paik, S., Brünner, N., Sommers, C. L., Zugmaier, G., Clarke, R., Shima, T. B., Torri, J., Donahue, S., Lippman, M. E., Martin, G. R., & Dickson, R. B.
Venue
Journal of Cellular Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-03
Volume
150
Issue
3
Pages
534-544
ISSN
  • 0021-9541 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4652
OpenAlex
W2166591651
Cited by
523
References
1
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of increased basement membrane invasiveness with absence of estrogen receptor and expression of vimentin in human breast cancer cell lines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcp.1041500314
The paper
Thompson, E. W., Paik, S., Brünner, N., Sommers, C. L., Zugmaier, G., Clarke, R., Shima, T. B., Torri, J., Donahue, S., Lippman, M. E., Martin, G. R., & Dickson, R. B. (1992). Association of increased basement membrane invasiveness with absence of estrogen receptor and expression of vimentin in human breast cancer cell lines. Journal of Cellular Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1041500314

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.