The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developmental transcription factor slug is required for effective re‐epithelialization by adult keratinocytes
Abstract
During re‐epithelialization of cutaneous wounds, keratinocytes recapitulate several aspects of the embryonic process of epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT), including migratory activity and reduced intercellular adhesion. The transcription factor Slug modulates EMT in the embryo and controls desmosome number in adult epithelial cells, therefore, we investigated Slug expression and function during cutaneous wound re‐epithelialization. Slug expression was elevated in keratinocytes bordering cutaneous wounds in mice in vivo, in keratinocytes migrating from mouse skin explants ex vivo, and in human keratinocytes at wound margins in vitro. Expression of the related transcription factor Snail was not significantly modulated in keratinocytes during re‐epithelialization in vitro. Epithelial cell outgrowth from skin explants of Slug knockout mice was severely compromised, indicating a critical role for Slug in epithelial keratinocyte migration. Overexpression of Slug in cultured human keratinocytes caused increased cell spreading and desmosomal disruption, both of which were most pronounced at wound margins. Furthermore, in vitro wound healing was markedly accelerated in keratinocytes that ectopically expressed Slug. Taken together, these findings suggest that Slug plays an important role during wound re‐epithelialization in adult skin and indicate that Slug controls some aspects of epithleial cell behavior in adult tissues as well as during embryonic development. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The snail superfamily of zinc-finger transcription factors
Nieto, M. A. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm757 · Cited by 1,719
Cited by
New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer
Dongre, A., & Weinberg, R. A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0080-4 · Cited by 3,876
Snail, Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: An alliance against the epithelial phenotype?
Peinado, H., Olmeda, D., & Cano, A. (2007) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2131 · Cited by 3,121
Puram, S. V., Tirosh, I., Parikh, A. S., Patel, A. P., Yizhak, K., Gillespie, S., Rodman, C., Luo, C. L., Mroz, E. A., Emerick, K. S., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.044 · Cited by 2,557
TGF-β1 Signaling and Tissue Fibrosis
Kim, K. K., Sheppard, D., & Chapman, H. A. (2018) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a022293 · Cited by 800
Exploring the role of stem cells in cutaneous wound healing
Lau, K., Paus, R., Tiede, S., Day, P., & Bayat, A. (2009) · Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.00942.x · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Savagner, P., Kusewitt, D. F., Carver, E. A., Magnino, F., Choi, C., Gridley, T., & Hudson, L. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Cellular Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08-27
- Volume
- 202
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 858-866
- ISSN
- 0021-9541 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4652
- OpenAlex
- W2039748798
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developmental transcription factor slug is required for effective re‐epithelialization by adult keratinocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcp.20188
- The paper
- Savagner, P., Kusewitt, D. F., Carver, E. A., Magnino, F., Choi, C., Gridley, T., & Hudson, L. G. (2005). Developmental transcription factor slug is required for effective re‐epithelialization by adult keratinocytes. Journal of Cellular Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.20188
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.