The DOI matches its Crossref record; 153 of the 153 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms and Consequences of Double‐Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin
Open accessAbstract
All organisms suffer double‐strand breaks (DSBs) in their DNA as a result of exposure to ionizing radiation. DSBs can also form when replication forks encounter DNA lesions or repair intermediates. The processing and repair of DSBs can lead to mutations, loss of heterozygosity, and chromosome rearrangements that result in cell death or cancer. The most common pathway used to repair DSBs in metazoans (non‐homologous DNA end joining) is more commonly mutagenic than the alternative pathway (homologous recombination mediated repair). Thus, factors that influence the choice of pathways used DSB repair can affect an individual's mutation burden and risk of cancer. This review describes radiological, chemical, and biological mechanisms that generate DSBs, and discusses the impact of such variables as DSB etiology, cell type, cell cycle, and chromatin structure on the yield, distribution, and processing of DSBs. The final section focuses on nucleosome‐specific mechanisms that influence DSB production, and the possible relationship between higher order chromosome coiling and chromosome shattering (chromothripsis). J. Cell. Physiol. 230: 3–14, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“SSBs may form DSBs through their collision with the transcriptional machinery and replication forks, or through their close proximity to another SSB.”
From Mechanisms of DNA damage-mediated neurotoxicity in neurodegenerative disease (2022) · cites this paper as Cannan & Pederson, 2016
In the citing paper
“DSBs are also directly generated by transcription (Cannan & Pederson, 2016), whereby topoisomerase II (TOP2) induces transient DSBs to relieve torsional stress and facilitate gene expression.”
From Mechanisms of DNA damage-mediated neurotoxicity in neurodegenerative disease (2022) · cites this paper as Cannan & Pederson, 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution
Luger, K., Mäder, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent, D. F., & Richmond, T. J. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/38444 · Cited by 9,466 · cited 2×
“Finally, reactions between ROS and nucleosomal DNA are impeded by the discrete interactions between histones and the DNA backbone at every helical turn (Luger et al., 1997).”
BackgroundFriedberg, E. C., Walker, G. C., Siede, W., Wood, R. D., Schultz, R. A., & Ellenberger, T. (2005) · doi:10.1128/9781555816704 · Cited by 5,683
Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt
Einstein, A. (1905) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19053220607 · Cited by 3,090
ATM and ATR Substrate Analysis Reveals Extensive Protein Networks Responsive to DNA Damage
Matsuoka, S., Ballif, B. A., Smogorzewska, A., McDonald, E. R., Hurov, K. E., Luo, J., Bakalarski, C. E., Zhao, Z., Solimini, N., Lerenthal, Y., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1140321 · Cited by 3,075
The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway
Lieber, M. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.093131 · Cited by 2,882 · cited 1×
“There are several excellent, recent reviews of DSB repair for readers looking for more detailed expositions (e.g., San Filippo et al., 2008; Lieber, 2010; Polo and Jackson, 2011; Asaithamby and Chen, 2011; Thompson, 2012; Mehta and Haber, 2014).”
BackgroundSupercoiling of the DNA template during transcription.
Liu, L. F., & Wang, J. C. (1987) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.84.20.7024 · Cited by 1,877 · cited 1×
“However, transcription elongation may occasionally outpace the action of topoisomerases, resulting in a transient accumulation of positive superhelical density ahead of the RNA polymerase, and a corresponding accumulation of negative superhelical density in the trailing region (Liu and Wang, 1987).”
BackgroundMechanism of Eukaryotic Homologous Recombination
Filippo, J. S., Sung, P., & Klein, H. L. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061306.125255 · Cited by 1,766
Rate of depurination of native deoxyribonucleic acid
Lindahl, T. L., & Nyberg, B. (1972) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00769a018 · Cited by 1,558 · cited 1×
“Most of these endogenously-generated ROS are neutralized, but enough escape to generate roughly 10,000 oxidative base lesions and another 10,000 base loss events per cell per day (Lindahl and Nyberg, 1972; Fraga et al., 1990 and reviewed in Friedberg et al., 2005).”
BackgroundWard, J. F. (1988) · Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology · doi:10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60611-x · Cited by 1,499
Spheroid Chromatin Units (ν Bodies)
Olins, A. L., & Olins, D. E. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.183.4122.330 · Cited by 1,430
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 1998, Strategic program plan for space radiation health research
- 10.1021/bi991999 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inflammation-induced DNA damage, mutations and cancer
Kay, J. E., Thadhani, E., Samson, L. D., & Engelward, B. P. (2019) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102673 · Cited by 495
Advances in genome editing through control of DNA repair pathways
Yeh, C. D., Richardson, C. D., & Corn, J. E. (2019) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-019-0425-z · Cited by 425
DNA Damage/Repair Management in Cancers
Alhmoud, J. F., Woolley, J. F., Moustafa, A. A., & Malki, M. I. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12041050 · Cited by 410
“Genotoxic agents cause structural changes in DNA by disrupting covalent bonds between nucleotides, preventing accurate replication of the genome [3].”
BackgroundBarnes, J. L., Zubair, M., John, K., Poirier, M. C., & Martin, F. L. (2018) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst20180519 · Cited by 320
Karagöz, G. E., Acosta‐Alvear, D., & Walter, P. (2019) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a033886 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Cannan, W. J., & Pederson, D. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Vermont (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pederson, David S.
- ORCID
- Cannan, Wendy J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cellular Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-09-28
- Volume
- 231
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-14
- ISSN
- 0021-9541 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4652
- PMC
- PMC4994891
- OpenAlex
- W1783508367
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 153
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Cellular Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- NCI (P01-CA098993)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- DNA double-strand breaks, chromatin, ionizing radiation, DNA damage mechanisms, DNA repair pathways, non-homologous end joining, homologous recombination, mutational burden, loss of heterozygosity, chromosomal rearrangements, nucleosome, chromatin structure, cell cycle, replication fork stalling, chromothripsis, chromosome coiling
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Cycle, Chromatin, DNA Repair, Humans, Radiation, Ionizing, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, DNA End-Joining Repair
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
