Cited by 20Migraine and Headache StudiesPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsAnesthesia and Pain Management

Ketamine for Refractory Chronic Migraine: An Observational Pilot Study and Metabolite Analysis

Open access
Schwenk, Eric S., Torjman, Marc C., Moaddel, Ruin, Lovett, Jacqueline, Katz, Daniel, Denk, William, Lauritsen, Clinton, Silberstein, Stephen D. +1 more·2021·The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Patients with refractory chronic migraine have substantial disability and have failed many acute and preventive medications. When aggressive intravenous therapy is indicated, both lidocaine and (R,S)‐ketamine infusions have been used successfully to provide relief. Retrospective studies have shown that both agents may be associated with short‐term analgesia. In this prospective, observational pilot study of 6 patients, we compared the effects of lidocaine and (R,S)‐ketamine infusions and performed metabolite analyses of (R,S)‐ketamine to determine its metabolic profile in this population. One of (R,S)‐ketamine's metabolites, (2R,6R)‐hydroxynorketamine, has been shown in animal studies to reduce pain, but human studies in patients undergoing continuous (R,S)‐ketamine infusions for migraine are lacking. All 6 patients tolerated both infusions well with mild adverse effects. The baseline mean pain rating (0‐10 numeric rating scale) decreased from 7.5 ± 2.2 to 4.7 ± 2.8 by end of lidocaine treatment () but increased to 7.0 ± 1.4 by the postdischarge visit at 4 weeks (P > .05 vs baseline). The baseline mean pain rating prior to ketamine treatment was 7.4 ± 1.4, which decreased to 3.7 ± 2.3 by the end of the hospitalization () but increased to 7.2 ± 1.7 by the postdischarge visit at 6 weeks (P > .05 vs baseline). For the primary outcome the change in pain from baseline to end of treatment was greater for ketamine than lidocaine (–3.7 vs –2.8; ), but this has minimal clinical significance. Ketamine metabolite analysis revealed that (2R,6R)‐hydroxynorketamine was the predominant metabolite during most of the infusion, consistent with previous studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcph.1920

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an observational pilot study of six participants, ketamine was slightly more effective than lidocaine for pain relief during hospitalization.

    “In an observational pilot study (n = 6), ketamine was slightly more effective than lidocaine for pain relief during hospitalization”

    From Ketamine in neuropsychiatric disorders: an update (2024) · cites this paper as [135]

  • In that study, pain levels returned to baseline within six weeks.

    “although pain levels returned to baseline within six weeks [135]”

    From Ketamine in neuropsychiatric disorders: an update (2024) · cites this paper as [135]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Hasan M, Hofstetter R, Fassauer GM, Link A, Siegmund W, Oswald S. Quantitative chiral and achiral determination of ketamine and its metabolites by LC-MS/MS in human serum, urine and fecal samples. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2017; 139: 87– 97. 28279931

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwenk, E. S., Torjman, M. C., Moaddel, R., Lovett, J., Katz, D., Denk, W., Lauritsen, C., Silberstein, S. D., & Wainer, I. W.
Affiliations
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US)
  • Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (US)
Corresponding author
Schwenk, Eric S.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-07-09
Volume
61
Issue
11
Pages
1421-1429
ISSN
  • 0021-9754 (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2700
  • 1552-4604
OpenAlex
W3172214963
Cited by
20
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The Medicine Forum (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99 AG999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
ketamine, lidocaine, intravenous infusion, hydroxynorketamine, ketamine metabolites, analgesia, adverse effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Analgesics, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Ketamine, Lidocaine, Male, Middle Aged, Migraine Disorders, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review