Cited by 26Schizophrenia research and treatmentPharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation to guide dose selection for RBP‐7000, a new sustained‐release formulation of risperidone

Laffont, Celine M., Gomeni, Roberto, Zheng, Bo, Heidbreder, Christian, Fudala, Paul J., Nasser, Azmi F.·2015·The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

RBP‐7000 is a long‐acting formulation of risperidone designed for once‐monthly subcutaneous injection for the treatment of schizophrenia. The objective was to estimate clinically effective doses of RBP‐7000 based on model simulations and on the comparison with other long‐acting injectable antipsychotics. A population pharmacokinetic model of RBP‐7000 was developed in 90 clinically stable schizophrenic patients having received single/repeated doses of 60, 90, or 120 mg. Model simulations were conducted to compare active moiety plasma exposure after repeated RBP‐7000 administrations to the published data of long‐acting risperidone injection (Risperdal® Consta®) at 25 and 50 mg, and of paliperidone palmitate (Invega® Sustenna®) at 50 and 100 mg equivalent paliperidone. Predictions of dopamine D2 receptor occupancy were derived from the simulated active moiety concentrations. Simulations showed similar active moiety plasma exposure at steady‐state for 90 mg of RBP‐7000 and 25 mg of long‐acting risperidone. In comparison to risperidone, RBP‐7000 reached effective concentrations immediately after the first administration. RBP‐7000 at the doses of 60 and 90 mg provided similar active moiety plasma concentrations at steady‐state compared to 50 and 100 mg equivalent paliperidone, respectively. These findings provide guidance for dose selection in Phase III clinical trials and suggest potential benefits for RBP‐7000 over competitors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcph.366

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laffont, C. M., Gomeni, R., Zheng, B., Heidbreder, C., Fudala, P. J., & Nasser, A. F.
Affiliations
  • Pharmacometrica La Fouillade France
  • Alleantis Research Triangle Park NC 27709 USA
  • Reckitt Benckiser (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Zheng, Bo
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-23
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
93-103
ISSN
  • 0021-9754 (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2700
  • 1552-4604
OpenAlex
W1972479462
Cited by
26
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
risperidone, long-acting injectable antipsychotics, sustained-release formulation, subcutaneous injection, schizophrenia, dose selection, population pharmacokinetic model, plasma exposure, dopamine D2 receptor occupancy, paliperidone palmitate, Risperdal Consta, model simulation
MeSH terms
Paliperidone Palmitate, Adult, Delayed-Action Preparations, Female, Humans, Isoxazoles, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Palmitates, Pyrimidines, Antipsychotic Agents, Risperidone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review