Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 79

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of creatine supplementation in combination with resistance training on lean mass in the elderly

Pinto, Camila Lemos, Botelho, Patrícia Borges, Carneiro, Juliana Alves, Mota, João Felipe·2016·Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle

Abstract

Background: Human ageing is a process characterized by loss of muscle mass, strength, and bone mass. We aimed to examine the efficacy of low‐dose creatine supplementation associated with resistance training on lean mass, strength, and bone mass in the elderly. Methods: This was a 12‐week, parallel‐group, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. The individuals were randomly allocated into one of the following groups: placebo plus resistance training (PL + RT) and creatine supplementation plus resistance training (CR + RT) . The participants were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks. The primary outcomes were lean mass and strength, assessed by dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) and ten‐repetition maximal tests (10 RM), respectively. Secondary outcomes included the lumbar spine, right and left femoral neck, both femur and whole body bone mineral density (BMD), and whole body bone mineral content (BMC), assessed by DXA. Results: The CR + RT group had superior gains in lean mass when compared with the PL + RT group (P = 0.02). Changes in the 10 RM tests in bench press and leg press exercises, body composition, BMD, and BMC of all assessed sites did not significantly differ between the groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Twelve weeks of low‐dose creatine supplementation associated with resistance training resulted in increases in lean mass in the elderly.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcsm.12094

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Araújo AP, 2014, Morphophysiologial alterations resulted from the process of musculoskeletal system aging and its consequences for the human body, Perspectivas: biológicas e saúde, 4, 22
  2. 10.1093/ageing/afq034 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1007/s00726-009-0263-6 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.2165/00007256-199519020-00003 · DOI
  5. 10.1055/s-2000-8859 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1097/00005768-200203000-00023 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Stout JR, 2007, Effects of creatine supplementation on the onset of neuromuscular fatigue threshold and muscle strength in elderly men and women (64–86 years), J Nutr Health Aging, 11, 459
  8. 10.1007/s12020-013-0070-4 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1046/j.1365-201X.2003.01050.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.2165/00007256-200434050-00005 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.metabol.2013.09.016 · DOI
  12. 10.1152/jappl.1996.81.1.232 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1152/ajpendo.1996.271.5.E821 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Garber CE, 2014, ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 162
  15. Galante AP, 2007, Development and validation of a computerized method for assessment of dietary intake, filled by adults using the Web [dissertation], 1
  16. 10.1152/jappl.1996.80.2.452 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318278f0db · DOI
  18. 10.1100/2012/913271 · DOI
  19. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00246.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1093/ajcn/65.4.1220S · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1046/j.1365-201X.1998.00427.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00891.2002 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1519/00139143-200508000-00002 · DOI
  24. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000571 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1007/s00726-011-0855-9 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1152/jappl.1999.87.2.598 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 79

Metadata

Authors
Pinto, C. L., Botelho, P. B., Carneiro, J. A., & Mota, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Laboratory of Research in Clinical Nutrition and Sports (Labince) Faculty of Nutrition Federal University of Goiás St 227, block 68, Setor Leste Universitário Goiânia Goiás 74.605‐080 Brazil
  • Faculty of Physical Education Federal University of Goiás Esperança Avenue, Campus Samambaia Goiânia Goiás 74.690‐900 Brazil
Venue
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01-18
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
413-421
ISSN
  • 2190-5991
  • 2190-6009
Cited by
79
References
18
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.