The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Thermal, chemical and thermo‐chemical pre‐treatment of waste activated sludge for anaerobic digestion
Abstract
The influence of different pre‐treatments was studied in order to observe the effects of temperature, pH and treatment time on Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) solubilization, and anaerobic digestion of pre‐treated sludge. Results showed that thermo‐chemical pre‐treatments were the most efficient on Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) solubilization, which could reach 83% at 170 °C with pH = 12. Yet, increase in COD solubilization in thermo‐chemical pre‐treatment was not linked to an increase in soluble Volatile Solids (VS) as optimal conditions were 170 °C, and 130 °C with pH = 10, for this criterion. So, temperature was found to be the most influential parameter on COD and VS solubilization. Biodegradability batch anaerobic tests confirmed results obtained on WAS solubilization, that is to say that 170 °C and 130 °C with pH = 10 were optimal conditions, with respectively 45% and 21% of anaerobic digestion enhancement. Thus these two conditions were chosen for sludge treatment before continuous anaerobic digestion. Results, after stabilization have shown a better efficiency of 170 °C compared with 130 °C with pH = 10 pre‐treatment, since after anaerobic digestion it led to 71% of COD degradation and 59% of Total Solids (TS) degradation, with an improvement of 54% in biogas production. The main differences between those two pre‐treatments could be due to the pre‐treatments themselves more than to an effect on anaerobic digestion, because the first one led to a partial loss of WAS COD (near 17% of initial COD) and the second one to an increase in TS due to addition of base. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bougrier, C., Delgenès, J. P., & Carrère, H. (2008) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2007.07.099 · Cited by 624
Self-citationA Review of Biochemical Process of Anaerobic Digestion
Adekunle, K. F., & Okolie, J. A. (2015) · Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology · doi:10.4236/abb.2015.63020 · Cited by 401
Climent, M., Ferrer, I., Baeza, M. D. M., Artola, A., Vázquez, F., & Font, X. (2007) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2007.02.020 · Cited by 344
A Review of Sludge-to-Energy Recovery Methods
Oladejo, J., Shi, K., Luo, X., Yang, G., & Wu, T. (2018) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12010060 · Cited by 322
Bougrier, C., Delgenès, J. P., & Carrère, H. (2007) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2006.11.013 · Cited by 301
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Valo, A., Carrère, H., & Delgenès, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-09-03
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1197-1203
- ISSN
- 0142-0356 (ISSN-L)
- 0268-2575
- 1097-4660
- OpenAlex
- W2111115102
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thermal, chemical and thermo‐chemical pre‐treatment of waste activated sludge for anaerobic digestion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jctb.1106
- The paper
- Valo, A., Carrère, H., & Delgenès, J. P. (2004). Thermal, chemical and thermo‐chemical pre‐treatment of waste activated sludge for anaerobic digestion. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.