Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of thermal and mechanical pretreatments of secondary sludge on biogas production under thermophilic conditions

Open access
Climent, Mavi, Ferrer, Ivet, Baeza, Ma del Mar, Artola, Adriana, Vázquez, Felícitas, Font, Xavier·2007·Chemical Engineering Journal

Abstract

Slow degradation of sewage sludge is a disadvantage of anaerobic digestion leading to high sludge retention times in conventional digesters. Hydrolysis has been pointed as the rate-limiting step in this process. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion has been proved effectively to reduce the retention time needed for sludge stabilization. Sludge pretreatment has been also proposed as a strategy to accelerate the hydrolytic step. The effectiveness of high and low temperature thermal pretreatment, ultrasonic and microwave pretreatments in secondary sludge disintegration has been studied by means of the increment in filterable volatile solids to total volatile solids ratio (FVS/TVS) respect to untreated sludge. Increments in this parameter ranging from three-fold for microwave treatment to nine-fold for high temperature thermal treatment have been obtained. Biogas production under thermophilic (55 °C) conditions for treated and untreated secondary sludge has also been evaluated. In spite of the values of FVS/TVS ratio obtained for all the treatments studied, no differences in biogas production were observed when high temperature thermal treatment, ultrasonic and microwave treatments are compared with untreated sludge. A 50% increment in biogas production was observed for low temperature (70 °C) thermally treated sludge. This type of treatment has been pointed as a predigestion step enhancing biological activity of some thermophilic hydrolytic bacteria.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cej.2007.02.020

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Climent, M., Ferrer, I., Baeza, M. D. M., Artola, A., Vázquez, F., & Font, X.
Venue
Chemical Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
133
Issue
1-3
Pages
335-342
ISSN
1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069500116
Cited by
344
References
16
FWCI
45.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of thermal and mechanical pretreatments of secondary sludge on biogas production under thermophilic conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cej.2007.02.020
The paper
Climent, M., Ferrer, I., Baeza, M. D. M., Artola, A., Vázquez, F., & Font, X. (2007). Effects of thermal and mechanical pretreatments of secondary sludge on biogas production under thermophilic conditions. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.02.020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.