Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ozone treatment of textile effluents and dyes: effect of applied ozone dose, pH and dye concentration

Sevimli, Mehmet F, Sarikaya, Hasan Z·2002·Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology

Abstract

The ozonation of wastewater supplied from a treatment plant (Samples A and B) and dye‐bath effluent (Sample C) from a dyeing and finishing mill and acid dye solutions in a semi‐batch reactor has been examined to explore the impact of ozone dose, pH, and initial dye concentration. Results revealed that the apparent rate constants were raised with increases in applied ozone dose and pH, and decreases in initial dye concentration. While the color removal efficiencies of both wastewater Samples A and C for 15 min ozonation at high ozone dosage were 95 and 97%, respectively, these were 81 and 87%, respectively at low ozone dosage. The chemical oxygen demand (COD) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal efficiencies at several ozone dose applications for a 15 min ozonation time were in the ranges of 15–46% and 10–20%, respectively for Sample A and 15–33% and 9–19% respectively for Sample C. Ozone consumption per unit color, COD and DOC removal at any time was found to be almost the same while the applied ozone dose was different. Ozonation could improve the BOD 5 (biological oxygen demand) COD ratio of Sample A by 1.6 times with 300 mg dm −3 ozone consumption. Ozonation of acid dyes was a pseudo‐first order reaction with respect to dye. Increases in dye concentration increased specific ozone consumption. Specific ozone consumption for Acid Red 183 (AR‐183) dye solution with a concentration of 50 mg dm −3 rose from 0.32 to 0.72 mg‐O 3 per mg dye decomposed as the dye concentration was increased to 500 mg dm −3 . © 2002 Society of Chemical Industry

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jctb.644

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1080/09593339409385500 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00330-4 · DOI
  3. Aplin R, 2000, Comparison of three advanced oxidation processes for degradation of textile dyes, Wat Sci Tech, 42, 345, 10.2166/wst.2000.0534 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/01919518708552400 · DOI
  5. Tzitzi M, 1994, Pretreatment of textile industry wastewater with ozone, Wat Sci Tech, 29, 151, 10.2166/wst.1994.0466 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00043-9 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0043-1354(83)90272-5 · DOI
  8. Gähr F, 1994, Ozonation—An important technique to comply with new German Laws for textile wastewater treatment, Wat Sci Tech, 30, 255, 10.2166/wst.1994.0115 · DOI
  9. SevimliM F Color removal from textile wastewater by ozonation and the effect of ozonation on biodegradability(in Turkish) PhD dissertation Institute of Science and Technology Istanbul Technical University (2000).
  10. 10.1080/01919519608547342 · DOI
  11. Balcioglu I A, 2001, Partial oxidation of reactive dyestuff and synthetic textile dye‐bath by the O3 and O3/H2O2 processes, Wat Sci Tech, 43, 221, 10.2166/wst.2001.0093 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0045-6535(95)00255-7 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/01919519308552483 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0011-9164(00)00074-6 · DOI
  15. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1998)124:3(272) · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0143-7208(01)00019-5 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00517-4 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0043-1354(83)90098-2 · DOI
  19. Langlais B, 1991, Ozone in Water Treatment: Application and Engineering
  20. 10.1252/jcej.14.383 · DOI
  21. APHA/AWWA/WEF, 1995, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
  22. Kallas J, 1994, Post treatment of pulp and paper industry wastewaters using oxidation and adsorption processes, Wat Sci Tech, 29, 259, 10.2166/wst.1994.0720 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/ie9600250 · DOI
  24. YazganM S Removal of endosulfan from waters by ozone oxidation(in Turkish) PhD dissertation Institute of Science and Technology Istanbul Technical University (2001).
  25. 10.1016/S1385-8947(99)00011-X · DOI
  26. Levespiel O, 1972, Chemical Reaction Engineering
  27. 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00036-X · DOI
  28. Lopez A, 1995, Biodegradability enhancement of refractory pollutants by ozonation: a laboratory investigation on azo‐dyes intermediate, Wat Sci Tech, 38, 239
  29. 10.1016/S0273-1223(96)00938-9 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/0043-1354(76)90055-5 · DOI
  31. 10.1021/es00142a012 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00358-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sevimli, M. F., & Sarikaya, H. Z.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-05-09
Volume
77
Issue
7
Pages
842-850
ISSN
  • 0268-2575
  • 1097-4660
Cited by
195
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review