A decade of grassroots pathway programming: Saturday Academy at New York University College of Dentistry
Open accessAbstract
Background: Successful pathway programs require early and sustained support of student participants. Purpose: We present the history and outcomes of a successful decade of continuous, grassroots, pathway programming at an individual dental institution. Methods: Programmatic data were used to evaluate information on program participant demographics, academic pursuits, and career interests. Descriptive analyses were used to report on program enrollment as well as alumni academic and career outcomes. Results: Between the years of 2013 and 2022, 346 high‐school students participated in Saturday Academy at NYU Dentistry. Of the 240 college‐aged and older program alumni, 72% (n = 172) have shared their academic and career plans after high‐school. At the time of publication, 78% (134/172) of alumni that have maintained contact with Saturday Academy and have expressed interest in pursuing a career in the health professions. Of the 172 alumni, 14% (n = 24) have enrolled in or graduated from a health professional program (dental hygiene, nursing, accelerated dental or medical program, dental or medical school, or other health professional program). Of these alumni (24/172), half (n = 12) have pursued education in the dental professions, specifically. Conclusion: Saturday Academy at NYU Dentistry is an example of a sustainable and impactful pathway program in dental education and its outcomes support the merit of calls for increased institutional commitment and support of similar initiatives.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Additional New York-based studies also described program enrollment patterns following program participation.
“Additional New York-based studies also described program enrollment patterns following program participation (DeOliveira & Daniels-Osaze, 2022;Pezzullo et al., 2023;Robles et al., 2021).”
From Pathway to Medicine and Health Programs Revisited: Outcomes and Institutional Adaptations in Greater Philadelphia and Beyond (2026) · cites this paper as Pezzullo et al., 2023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bright, D., Hughes, S., & Muir, R. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16010170 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pezzullo, C., Mejia, E. E., & Burns, L. E.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Saturday Academy (US)
- Corresponding author
- Burns, Lorel E.
- ORCID
- Burns, Lorel E.
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-06-07
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1271-1278
- ISSN
- 0022-0337 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-7837
- OpenAlex
- W4379600975
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Dental Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- high school students, alumni outcomes, dental school admissions, program sustainability
- MeSH terms
- Career Choice, Dentistry, Humans, Minority Groups, New York, Schools, Students, Universities, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review