Cited by 4Dental Education, Practice, ResearchMedical Education and AdmissionsInnovations in Medical Education

A decade of grassroots pathway programming: Saturday Academy at New York University College of Dentistry

Open access
Pezzullo, Cheryline, Mejia, Eugenia E., Burns, Lorel E.·2023·Journal of Dental Education

Abstract

Background: Successful pathway programs require early and sustained support of student participants. Purpose: We present the history and outcomes of a successful decade of continuous, grassroots, pathway programming at an individual dental institution. Methods: Programmatic data were used to evaluate information on program participant demographics, academic pursuits, and career interests. Descriptive analyses were used to report on program enrollment as well as alumni academic and career outcomes. Results: Between the years of 2013 and 2022, 346 high‐school students participated in Saturday Academy at NYU Dentistry. Of the 240 college‐aged and older program alumni, 72% (n = 172) have shared their academic and career plans after high‐school. At the time of publication, 78% (134/172) of alumni that have maintained contact with Saturday Academy and have expressed interest in pursuing a career in the health professions. Of the 172 alumni, 14% (n = 24) have enrolled in or graduated from a health professional program (dental hygiene, nursing, accelerated dental or medical program, dental or medical school, or other health professional program). Of these alumni (24/172), half (n = 12) have pursued education in the dental professions, specifically. Conclusion: Saturday Academy at NYU Dentistry is an example of a sustainable and impactful pathway program in dental education and its outcomes support the merit of calls for increased institutional commitment and support of similar initiatives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jdd.13255

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Pezzullo, C., Mejia, E. E., & Burns, L. E.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Saturday Academy (US)
Corresponding author
Burns, Lorel E.
Venue
Journal of Dental Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-06-07
Volume
87
Issue
9
Pages
1271-1278
ISSN
  • 0022-0337 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7837
OpenAlex
W4379600975
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dental Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
high school students, alumni outcomes, dental school admissions, program sustainability
MeSH terms
Career Choice, Dentistry, Humans, Minority Groups, New York, Schools, Students, Universities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review