The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative Examination of Why Undergraduates Leave Engineering: Engineering Dropouts: Why Undergraduates Leave Engineering
Abstract
Background While spending to prepare precollege students for engineering at universities increases, the number of engineering graduates continues to decrease, and attrition rates for engineering undergraduates remain high. Universities are motivated to understand the factors contributing to low retention of engineering undergraduates. Purpose/Hypothesis This article explores the experiences of four undergraduates who chose to leave engineering and provides insight into their reasons for leaving. Through attention to their experiences, this study captures participants' points of view as they explain how they made their decisions. Design/Method Students who recently left engineering were interviewed and completed a journey-mapping exercise describing their motivations and experiences. Analysis identified institutional and individual factors that contributed to their decisions to leave. Results Common themes of nonpersisting engineering undergraduates included individual factors (such as poor performance, feeling unprepared for demands of the engineering program, difficulty fitting into engineering) and institutional factors (such as disappointment with engineering advising). Concepts uncovered in this article not present in existing research include an emotional attachment between participants and the concept of being an engineer, students' sense of loss and failure, and their easy transition from engineering to another major. Conclusions Individual factors leading to attrition include unwillingness of students to adapt to the rigor of the engineering program and loss of confidence due to poor performance. Institutional factors also contribute to attrition. The key to understanding why students leave engineering is at the confluence of institutional and individual factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · Cited by 45,787
Qualitative research & evaluation methods
Patton, M. Q. (2002) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 15,523
Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research
Tinto, V. (1975) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170024 · Cited by 7,888
Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction
Glesne, C. (1991) · Cited by 7,507
(2011) · Cited by 7,157
The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research[1]
(2006) · Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/17465640610666642 · Cited by 5,842
Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences
Correll, S. J., Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2655673 · Cited by 3,086
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE OF STUDENT RETENTION: WHAT NEXT?
Tinto, V. (2006) · Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice · doi:10.2190/4ynu-4tmb-22dj-an4w · Cited by 1,936
Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition
Bean, J. P. (1980) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/bf00976194 · Cited by 1,498
Doing Qualitative Research Differently
Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781849209007 · Cited by 1,479
Cited by
Hempel, B., Kiehlbaugh, K., & Blowers, P. (2020) · Education for Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.ece.2020.07.004 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, M., & Marx, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-09-19
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 525-548
- ISSN
- 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1857367885
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 87.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative Examination of Why Undergraduates Leave Engineering: Engineering Dropouts: Why Undergraduates Leave Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jee.20054
- The paper
- Meyer, M., & Marx, S. (2014). Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative Examination of Why Undergraduates Leave Engineering: Engineering Dropouts: Why Undergraduates Leave Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.