The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning Together: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration of STEAM (STEM + the Arts) Education
Abstract
Background: There is a growing interest in STEAM (STEM + the Arts) education as a means to enhance the creativity of STEM students and broaden interest in STEM fields. Many art educators, however, object to the instrumental justification for study in the arts as a way to improve student performance in other areas. Purpose: Drawing on the first two authors' engagement in an interdisciplinary design studio, this study develops an expanded view of how STEAM might enrich engineering education in ways that more closely align with the pedagogical commitments of the arts. Design/Method: This article is written as a collaborative autoethnography between the first two authors, educators in environmental engineering and art education, respectively. The study is grounded in the educational philosophy of arts advocate Maxine Greene, who views learning as an active, collaborative search for meaning, “wide‐awakeness,” and social change. Results: Our dialogue reveals the potential for STEAM to provide students and educators with opportunities to explore personally relevant connections between materials, design, society, and the natural environment and to critically engage with implicit and explicit facets of disciplinary identity. Conclusions: This view of STEAM simultaneously complements and challenges current conceptions of this emerging educational movement that, almost without exception, are underpinned by calls for competitive economic growth and technological development. We hope future research will build on our perspectives to continue a conversation about STEAM that considers the diverse contributions of, and mutual benefits to, all parties involved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011) · GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences · doi:10.12759/hsr.36.2011.4.273-290 · Cited by 3,559
Inquiry as stance: practitioner research for the next generation
Mockler, N. (2010) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/09650792.2010.525018 · Cited by 1,664
Cited by
Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications
Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6 · Cited by 494
Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support
Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., van Baalen, S., Klaassen, R., & Boon, M. (2020) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20347 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Sochacka, N. W., Guyotte, K. W., & Walther, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-42
- ISSN
- 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-9830
- OpenAlex
- W2522980220
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning Together: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration of STEAM (STEM + the Arts) Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jee.20112
- The paper
- Sochacka, N. W., Guyotte, K. W., & Walther, J. (2016). Learning Together: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration of STEAM (STEM + the Arts) Education. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.