The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support
Open accessAbstract
Background: Societal challenges that call for a new type of engineer suggest the need for the implementation of interdisciplinary engineering education (IEE). The aim of IEE is to train engineering students to bring together expertise from different disciplines in a single context. This review synthesizes IEE research with a focus on characterizing vision, teaching practices, and support. Purpose: We aim to show how IEE is conceptualized, implemented, and facilitated in higher engineering education at the levels of curricula and courses. This aim leads to two research questions: What aspects of vision, teaching, and support have emerged as topics of interest in empirical studies of IEE? What points of attention regarding vision, teaching, and support can be identified in empirical studies of IEE as supporting or challenging IEE? Scope/Method: Ninety‐nine studies published between 2005 and 2016 were included in a qualitative analysis across studies. The procedure included formulation of research questions, searching and screening of studies according to inclusion/exclusion criteria, description of study characteristics, appraisal, and synthesis of results. Conclusions: Challenges exist for identifying clear learning goals and assessments for interdisciplinary education in engineering (vision). Most pedagogy for interdisciplinary learning is designed to promote collaborative teamwork requiring organization and team management. Our review suggests that developing interdisciplinary skills, knowledge, and values needs sound pedagogy and teaming experiences that provide students with authentic ways of engaging in interdisciplinary practice (teaching). Furthermore, there is a limited understanding of what resources hinder the development of engineering programs designed to support interdisciplinarity (support).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x · Cited by 10,817
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312
Handbook of Research on Science Education
Abell, S. K. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203824696 · Cited by 4,447
Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006) · doi:10.1002/9780470754887 · Cited by 3,586
Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., Hsu, R., Katbamna, S., Olsen, R., Smith, L., et al. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-35 · Cited by 2,289
Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education
Engle, K. K. (1981) · The American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.35.8.539b · Cited by 2,140
What the Student Does: teaching for enhanced learning
Biggs, J. (1999) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/0729436990180105 · Cited by 1,332
STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration
English, L. D. (2016) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1 · Cited by 1,088
The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-2406 · Cited by 1,016
Start with Why: How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action
Sinek, S. (2009) · Cited by 965
Cited by
Groothuijsen, S., van den Beemt, A., Remmers, J. C., & van Meeuwen, L. W. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100290 · Cited by 92
Self-citationHusin, M., Usmeldi, U., Masdi, H., Simatupang, W., Fadhilah, F., & Hendriyani, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.17583/rise.15125 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., van Baalen, S., Klaassen, R., & Boon, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-06-30
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 508-555
- ISSN
- 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-9830
- OpenAlex
- W3021051128
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 262.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jee.20347
- The paper
- Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., van Baalen, S., Klaassen, R., & Boon, M. (2020). Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.