Large-scale student programs increase persistence in STEM fields in a public university setting
Open accessAbstract
Background: Louisiana State University's (LSU) STEM Talent Expansion Program (STEP) was established to increase students' persistence in first‐year, declared engineering majors (a project priority), in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) majors (an NSF goal), and in all majors at LSU (an institutional goal). Over 8 years, 3,097 (27%) engineering students participated in one or more STEP activities including a residential college, a student mentoring program, an introductory engineering design course, and a summer bridge camp for first‐year students. Purpose: This paper describes the influence of the STEP activities on persistence, while accounting for demographic and academic preparation variables. Design/Method: Data collected over 8 years from first‐year engineering students include demographics, academic preparation, participation in STEP activities, and yearly status regarding major and graduation. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple logistic regression determine which factors significantly impact persistence in engineering majors, in STEM majors, and in all majors at LSU. Results: STEP participants have higher persistence levels than nonparticipants by at least 11% in engineering, 9% in STEM, and 5% in all majors at LSU. Gender, ACT math scores, and, in some cases, ethnicity significantly impact persistence. Participation in the residential college, introductory course, and mentoring programs significantly increased persistence in engineering majors, in STEM majors, and at the university, while the summer bridge camp did not show as much influence on persistence overall. Conclusion: STEP was successful at increasing persistence in engineering and STEM majors. Specific STEP activities continue to evolve in the College of Engineering and should continue to reap positive results in the persistence of engineering students.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on specific programs shows that SBPs can positively impact students' experiences during their first year, persistence in higher education, and pass rates.
“Despite the variation among different implementations of SBPs, research on specific programs shows that these programs can positively impact students' experiences during their first year (Barth et al., 2021), persistence in higher education (Ikuma et al., 2019) and pass rates (Wathington et al., 2011).”
From Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Ikuma et al., 2019
Cites
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20237 · Cited by 2,433 · see citing works
Chang, M. J., Eagan, M. K., Lin, M. H., & Hurtado, S. (2011) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/jhe.2011.0030 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Preparing minority scientists and engineers
Summers, M. F., & Hrabowski, F. A. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1125257 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review
Caballero Díaz, D., Amin, A., Musa, P., & Leung, V. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16020220
- Authors
- Ikuma, L. H., Steele, A., Dann, S., Adio, O., & Waggenspack, W. N.
- Affiliations
- Louisiana State University (US)
- Career and Technical Education Center, East Baton Rouge Parish Schools Baton Rouge Louisiana
- Corresponding author
- Ikuma, Laura H.
- ORCID
- Ikuma, Laura H.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-81
- ISSN
- 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-9830
- OpenAlex
- W2913461201
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 9.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- repository.lsu.edu
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Engineering Education (publishedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (STEP 1A 0622524 and 1B 1161311)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- student persistence, STEM retention, engineering students, residential colleges, student mentoring, summer bridge programs, first-year students, LSU, ethnicity, academic preparation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review