The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Three‐Dimensional reconstruction of single particles from random and nonrandom tilt series
Abstract
To overcome the radiation damage‐induced limitations to the resolution of three‐dimensional reconstructions from electron microscopic tilt series, novel reconstruction schemes have been developed that require only a single exposure of the specimen. The tilt series collected with these methods have random projection directions. First, three‐dimensional reconstruction techniques are described that are applicable to data obtained from tilt series with regular tilt geometry, followed by the extensions of these techniques to permit analysis of projection series with randomly spaced tilts. The main emphasis is placed on the weighted back‐projection methods, which have recently been extended so as to be applicable to random tilt series. Besides a description of the algorithms, the complete procedure for a threedimensional reconstruction from a single‐exposure, random conical tilt series is explained, including the determination of the azimuthal angles, the alignment scheme for conical tilt series, the dependence of the achievable resolution on the number of projections for regular conical and single‐axis geometries, and the method to calculate the actual resolution of two‐dimensional image averages and of three‐dimensional reconstructions using the phase residual and Fourier ring correlation criteria. Examples are given of biological specimens to which these three‐dimensional reconstruction methods have been applied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Outcome of the first electron microscopy validation task force meeting
Henderson, R., Sali, A., Baker, M. L., Carragher, B., Devkota, B., Downing, K. H., Egelman, E. H., Feng, Z., Frank, J., Grigorieff, N., et al. (2012) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2011.12.014 · Cited by 505
TOM software toolbox: acquisition and analysis for electron tomography
Nickell, S., Förster, F., Linaroudis, A., Net, W. D., Beck, F., Hegerl, R., Baumeister, W., & Plitzko, J. M. (2005) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2004.10.006 · Cited by 448
The structure of the dynactin complex and its interaction with dynein
Urnavicius, L., Zhang, K., Diamant, A. G., Motz, C., Schlager, M. A., Yu, M., Patel, N. A., Robinson, C. V., & Carter, A. P. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa4080 · Cited by 421
The architecture of active zone material at the frog's neuromuscular junction
Harlow, M. L., Ress, D., Stoschek, A., Marshall, R. M., & McMahan, U. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35054000 · Cited by 388
Subunit Architecture and Functional Modular Rearrangements of the Transcriptional Mediator Complex
Tsai, K.-L., Tomomori-Sato, C., Sato, S., Conaway, R. C., Conaway, J. W., & Asturias, F. J. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.015 · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Radermacher, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Electron Microscopy Technique
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 359-394
- ISSN
- 0741-0581 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-0817
- OpenAlex
- W2093056685
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three‐Dimensional reconstruction of single particles from random and nonrandom tilt series. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jemt.1060090405
- The paper
- Radermacher, M. (1988). Three‐Dimensional reconstruction of single particles from random and nonrandom tilt series. Journal of Electron Microscopy Technique. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.1060090405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.