Cited by 421Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsGenetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesProtein Structure and Dynamics

The structure of the dynactin complex and its interaction with dynein

Open access
Urnavicius, Linas, Zhang, Kai, Diamant, Aristides G., Motz, Carina, Schlager, Max A., Yu, Minmin, Patel, Nisha A., Robinson, Carol V. +1 more·2015·Science

Abstract

Making a molecular motor fit for purpose: Dynactin is an essential cofactor of the microtubule motor, cytoplasmic dynein. Dynactin contains 23 subunits built around a short filament of an actin-related protein (Arp1). How dynactin is assembled, how it functions with dynein, and why it is built around an actin-like filament is unclear. Urnavicius et al. combined cryo–electron microscopy structural studies and a crystal structure to determine the three-dimensional architecture of dynactin and how it interacts with dynein. Science , this issue p. 1441

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aaa4080

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the PDB dataset, a dimeric CC in a cryo-EM structure of the motor-protein dynein tail-dynactin-BICD2N complex (PDB ID 5afu) has a helix spanning 165 residues.

    “For instance, in the PDB dataset, a dimeric CC in a cryo‐EM structure of the motor‐protein dynein tail‐dynactin‐BICD2N complex (PDB ID, 5afu) (Urnavicius et al., 2015) has a helix spanning 165 residues.”

    From <scp> CC <sup>+</sup> </scp> : A searchable database of validated coiled coils in <scp>PDB</scp> structures and <scp>AlphaFold2</scp> models (2023) · cites this paper as Urnavicius et al., 2015

    In “Dynein and BICD bind the dynactin filament” (page unavailable), the paper reports an 8.2 Å cryo-EM structure of the dynein tail–dynactin–BICD2N complex and a BICD2N coiled coil. Our copy does not identify that structure as PDB 5afu or state that a helix spans 165 residues; it describes the coiled coil as approximately 270 residues long. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. [1]Gill SR J. Cell Biol 1991 115 1639 1650 1836789 PMC2289205
  2. [2]McGrail M J. Cell Biol 1995 131 411 425 7593168 PMC2199972
  3. [3]Plamann M Minke PF Tinsley JH Bruno KS J. Cell Biol 1994 127 139 149 7929559 PMC2120181
  4. [4]Allan VJ Biochem. Soc. Trans 2011 39 1169 1178 21936784
  5. [5]Schiavo G Greensmith L Hafezparast M Fisher EMC Trends Neurosci 2013 36 641 651 24035135 PMC3824068
  6. [6]Dodding MP Way M EMBO J 2011 30 3527 3539 21878994 PMC3181490
  7. [7]Schafer DA Gill SR Cooper JA Heuser JE Schroer TA J. Cell Biol 1994 126 403 412 7518465 PMC2200042
  8. [8]Schroer TA Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2004 20 759 779 15473859
  9. [9]Siglin AE PLoS ONE 2013 8 e59453 23577064 PMC3618186
  10. [10]Duellberg C Nat. Cell Biol 2014 16 804 811 24997520
  11. [11]King SJ Brown CL Maier KC Quintyne NJ Schroer TA Molecular Biology of the Cell 2003 14 5089 5097 14565986 PMC284810
  12. [12]Splinter D Molecular Biology of the Cell 2012 23 4226 4241 22956769 PMC3484101
  13. [13]Schlager MA Hoang HT Urnavicius L Bullock SL Carter AP EMBO J 2014 33 1855 1868 24986880 PMC4158905
  14. [14]McKenney RJ Huynh W Tanenbaum ME Bhabha G Vale RD Science 2014 345 337 341 25035494 PMC4224444
  15. [15]Dienstbier M Li X Biochem. Soc. Trans 2009 37 1066 1071 19754453
  16. [16]Hodgkinson JL Peters C Kuznetsov SA Steffen W Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005 102 3667 3672 15738427 PMC553325
  17. [17]Imai H Narita A Maéda Y Schroer TA J Mol Biol 2014 426 3262 3271 25046383 PMC4216434
  18. [18]Bingham JB Schroer TA Curr. Biol 1999 9 223 226 10074429
  19. [19]Bai X-C McMullan G Scheres SHW Trends Biochem. Sci 2015 40 49 57 25544475
  20. [21]Yamashita A Maeda K Maéda Y EMBO J 2003 22 1529 1538 12660160 PMC152911
  21. [22]Yeh TY EMBO J 2013 32 1023 1035 23455152 PMC3616283
  22. [23]Holleran EA Tokito MK Karki S Holzbaur EL J. Cell Biol 1996 135 1815 1829 8991093 PMC2133946
  23. [24]von der Ecken J Nature 2014 doi:10.1038/nature14033 · DOI
  24. [25]Narita A Takeda S Yamashita A Maéda Y EMBO J 2006 25 5626 5633 17110933 PMC1679762
  25. [26]Cheong FKY Feng L Sarkeshik A Yates JR Schroer TA Molecular Biology of the Cell 2014 25 2171 2180 24829381 PMC4091830
  26. [27]Eckley DM J. Cell Biol 1999 147 307 320 10525537 PMC2174220
  27. [28]Yeh TY Quintyne NJ Scipioni BR Eckley DM Schroer TA Molecular Biology of the Cell 2012 23 3827 3837 22918948 PMC3459859
  28. [29]Hammesfahr B Kollmar M BMC Evol. Biol 2012 12 95 22726940 PMC3583065
  29. [30]Tripathy SK Nat. Cell Biol 2014 16 1192 1201 25419851 PMC4250405
  30. [31]Pfister KK Benashski SE Dillman JF Patel-King RS King SM Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 1998 41 154 167 9786090
  31. [32]Lees-Miller JP Helfman DM Schroer TA Nature 1992 359 244 246 1528266
  32. [33]Behrmann E Cell 2012 150 327 338 22817895 PMC4163373
  33. [34]Liu Y Genes Dev 2013 27 1233 1246 23723415 PMC3690397
  34. [35]Tynan SH Gee MA Vallee RB J. Biol. Chem 2000 275 32769 32774 10893223
  35. [36]Williams JC Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007 104 10028 10033 17551010 PMC1885999
  36. [37]Benison G Karplus PA Barbar E J Mol Biol 2007 371 457 468 17570393
  37. [38]van Spronsen M Neuron 2013 77 485 502 23395375
  38. [39]Jordens I Curr. Biol 2001 11 1680 1685 11696325
  39. [40]Torisawa T Nat. Cell Biol 2014 16 1118 1124 25266423

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Urnavicius, L., Zhang, K., Diamant, A. G., Motz, C., Schlager, M. A., Yu, M., Patel, N. A., Robinson, C. V., & Carter, A. P.
Affiliations
  • MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Urnavicius, Linas
  • Zhang, Kai
  • Diamant, Aristides G.
  • Carter, Andrew P.
Venue
Science
Published
2015-03-27
Volume
347
Issue
6229
Pages
1441-1446
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2061126550
Cited by
421
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 17
FWCI
26.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (WT100387)
  • Medical Research Council, UK (MC_UP_A025_1011)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
dynactin, cytoplasmic dynein-1, Arp1, beta-actin, microtubule motor proteins, cryo-EM structure, coiled coil, cargo adaptors
MeSH terms
Dynactin Complex, Actins, Animals, Dyneins, Humans, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Swine, Protein Structure, Secondary, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Protein Subunits, Protein Interaction Mapping, Multiprotein Complexes, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review