Cited by 72

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Application of WGA lectin staining for visualization of the connective tissue in skeletal muscle, bone, and ligament/tendon studies

Kostrominova, Tatiana Y.·2011·Microscopy Research and Technique

Abstract

During immunostaining of specific proteins in tissue sections using monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies, visualization of general tissue staining/background or major structural features is helpful to pinpoint precise localization of the protein of interest. Often in skeletal muscle research, immunostaining with antibodies against connective tissue or plasma membrane proteins (collagen 1, laminin, and caveolin 3) are used for this purpose. Although immunostaining for these proteins works well, it is time consuming, costly, limits the number of antibodies against protein of interest that can be used on a single section, and is not applicable to some staining techniques. Lectins were frequently used in earlier publications for skeletal muscle fiber boundaries and connective tissue visualization, but are not common in the current research studies. This work investigates costaining of muscle, bone, ligament, and tendon tissue sections with fluorescently tagged wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) lectin as a tool for the visualization of connective tissue. The results of this study show that fluorescent WGA lectin costaining is a cost‐effective, fast, and convenient method for connective tissue visualization, especially in the studies where extensive washes reduce staining of the structures that are the primary interest of the investigation. Microsc. Res. Tech. 74:18‐22, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jemt.20865

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.032 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1007/BF01003405 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s00438-009-0460-8 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0022-510X(85)90026-7 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/icb.2008.46 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/BF02890187 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/ar.1092120202 · DOI
  8. 10.1046/j.0021-8782.2001.00008.x · DOI
  9. 10.1002/path.1711550407 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0014-4886(90)90023-L · DOI
  11. 10.1007/BF00194612 · DOI
  12. 10.1023/A:1018624715326 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/jcb.240570116 · DOI
  14. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00210.2004 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s00441-006-0297-y · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s10735-006-9071-4 · DOI
  17. 10.1097/00005768-200207000-00001 · DOI
  18. 10.3109/10520299609117143 · DOI
  19. 10.1369/jhc.2008.950105 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2008.04.003 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/29.4.6166659 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/978-1-59745-426-1_14 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/002215540405200205 · DOI
  24. 10.1155/2008/601583 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/BF00737079 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/BF00492470 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62332-2 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0014-4908(77)80069-0 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0378-1119(03)00425-6 · DOI
  30. Zhao J, 2008, Protein biomarkers in cancer: Natural glycoprotein microarray approaches, Curr Opin Mol Ther, 10, 602

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kostrominova, T. Y.
Venue
Microscopy Research and Technique
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-22
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
18-22
ISSN
  • 1059-910X
  • 1097-0029
Cited by
72
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review