The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Application of WGA lectin staining for visualization of the connective tissue in skeletal muscle, bone, and ligament/tendon studies
Abstract
During immunostaining of specific proteins in tissue sections using monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies, visualization of general tissue staining/background or major structural features is helpful to pinpoint precise localization of the protein of interest. Often in skeletal muscle research, immunostaining with antibodies against connective tissue or plasma membrane proteins (collagen 1, laminin, and caveolin 3) are used for this purpose. Although immunostaining for these proteins works well, it is time consuming, costly, limits the number of antibodies against protein of interest that can be used on a single section, and is not applicable to some staining techniques. Lectins were frequently used in earlier publications for skeletal muscle fiber boundaries and connective tissue visualization, but are not common in the current research studies. This work investigates costaining of muscle, bone, ligament, and tendon tissue sections with fluorescently tagged wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) lectin as a tool for the visualization of connective tissue. The results of this study show that fluorescent WGA lectin costaining is a cost‐effective, fast, and convenient method for connective tissue visualization, especially in the studies where extensive washes reduce staining of the structures that are the primary interest of the investigation. Microsc. Res. Tech. 74:18‐22, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Fluorescently tagged WGA lectin binds to connective tissues, including muscle, bone, ligament, and tendon.73,74”
From SEMTWIST Quantification of Biofilm Infection in Human Chronic Wound Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Machine Learning (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.032 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF01003405 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00438-009-0460-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-510X(85)90026-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/icb.2008.46 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02890187 · DOI
- 10.1002/ar.1092120202 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.0021-8782.2001.00008.x · DOI
- 10.1002/path.1711550407 · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-4886(90)90023-L · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00194612 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1018624715326 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcb.240570116 · DOI
- 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00210.2004 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00441-006-0297-y · DOI
- 10.1007/s10735-006-9071-4 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005768-200207000-00001 · DOI
- 10.3109/10520299609117143 · DOI
- 10.1369/jhc.2008.950105 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejcb.2008.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1177/29.4.6166659 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-59745-426-1_14 · DOI
- 10.1177/002215540405200205 · DOI
- 10.1155/2008/601583 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00737079 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00492470 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62332-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0014-4908(77)80069-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-1119(03)00425-6 · DOI
- Zhao J, 2008, Protein biomarkers in cancer: Natural glycoprotein microarray approaches, Curr Opin Mol Ther, 10, 602
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Singh, S., Muniz De Oliveira, F., Wang, C., Kumar, M., Xuan, Y., DeMazumder, D., Sen, C. K., & Roy, S. (2025) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2024.0291 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Kostrominova, T. Y.
- Venue
- Microscopy Research and Technique
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12-22
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-22
- ISSN
- 1059-910X
- 1097-0029
- PMC
- PMC3058533
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review