The miR‐126‐5p and miR‐212‐3p in the extracellular vesicles activate monocytes in the early stage of radiation‐induced vascular inflammation implicated in atherosclerosis
Abstract
People exposed to radiation in cancer therapy and nuclear accidents are at increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes in long‐term survivors. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are involved in radiation‐induced endothelial dysfunction, but their role in the early stage of vascular inflammation after radiation exposure remains to be fully understood. Herein, we demonstrate that endothelial cell‐derived EVs containing miRNAs initiate monocyte activation in radiation‐induced vascular inflammation. In vitro co‐culture and in vivo experimental data showed that endothelial EVs can be sensitively increased by radiation exposure in a dose‐dependent manner, and stimulate monocytes releasing monocytic EVs and adhesion to endothelial cells together with an increase in the expression of genes encoding specific ligands for cell‐cell interaction. Small RNA sequencing and transfection using mimics and inhibitors explained that miR‐126‐5p and miR‐212‐3p enriched in endothelial EVs initiate vascular inflammation by monocyte activation after radiation exposure. Moreover, miR‐126‐5p could be detected in the circulating endothelial EVs of radiation‐induced atherosclerosis model mice, which was found to be tightly correlated with the atherogenic index of plasma. In summary, our study showed that miR‐126‐5p and miR‐212‐3p present in the endothelial EVs mediate the inflammatory signals to activate monocytes in radiation‐induced vascular injury. A better understanding of the circulating endothelial EVs content can promote their use as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for atherosclerosis after radiation exposure.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
EV-TRACK: transparent reporting and centralizing knowledge in extracellular vesicle research
EV-TRACK Consortium, Van Deun, J., Mestdagh, P., Agostinis, P., Akay, Ö., Anand, S., Anckaert, J., Martinez, Z. A., Baetens, T., Beghein, E., et al. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4185 · Cited by 1,284 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Choi, Y. Y., Kim, A., Lee, Y., Lee, Y. H., Park, M., Shin, E., Park, S., Youn, B., & Seong, K. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 2001-3078
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (50091‐2022)
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF‐2019R1A2C2087416)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review