Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ammonia excretion and urea handling by fish gills: present understanding and future research challenges

Wilkie, Michael Patrick·2002·Journal of Experimental Zoology

Abstract

In fresh water fishes, ammonia is excreted across the branchial epithelium via passive NH 3 diffusion. This NH 3 is subsequently trapped as NH in an acidic unstirred boundary layer lying next to the gill, which maintains the blood‐to‐gill water NH 3 partial pressure gradient. Whole animal, in situ, ultrastructural and molecular approaches suggest that boundary layer acidification results from the hydration of CO 2 in the expired gill water, and to a lesser extent H+ excretion mediated by apical H+‐ATPases. Boundary layer acidification is insignificant in highly buffered sea water, where ammonia excretion proceeds via NH 3 diffusion, as well as passive NH diffusion due to the greater ionic permeability of marine fish gills. Although Na+/H+ exchangers (NHE) have been isolated in marine fish gills, possible Na+/NH exchange via these proteins awaits evaluation using modern electrophysiological and molecular techniques. Although urea excretion (JUrea) was thought to be via passive diffusion, it is now clear that branchial urea handling requires specialized urea transporters. Four urea transporters have been cloned in fishes, including the shark kidney urea transporter (shUT), which is a facilitated urea transporter similar to the mammalian renal UT‐A2 transporter. Another urea transporter, characterized but not yet cloned, is the basolateral, Na+ dependent urea antiporter of the dogfish gill, which is essential for urea retention in ureosmotic elasmobranchs. In ureotelic teleosts such as the Lake Magadi tilapia and the gulf toadfish, the cloned mtUT and tUT are facilitated urea transporters involved in JUrea. A basolateral urea transporter recently cloned from the gill of the Japanese eel (eUT) may actually be important for urea retention during salt water acclimation. A multi‐faceted approach, incorporating whole animal, histological, biochemical, pharmacological, and molecular techniques is required to learn more about the location, mechanism of action, and functional significance of urea transporters in fishes. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jez.10123

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Wilkie, M. P.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Zoology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-06-28
Volume
293
Issue
3
Pages
284-301
ISSN
  • 0022-104X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-010X
OpenAlex
W2079933355
Cited by
304
References
0
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ammonia excretion and urea handling by fish gills: present understanding and future research challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jez.10123
The paper
Wilkie, M. P. (2002). Ammonia excretion and urea handling by fish gills: present understanding and future research challenges. Journal of Experimental Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.10123

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.