The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Notochordal induction of cell wedging in the chick neural plate and its role in neural tube formation
Abstract
Cells in the median hinge point (MHP) of the bending chick neural plate are tightly apposed to the underlying notochord. These cells differ from those in adjacent lateral neuroepithelial areas (L) in that MHP cells are short and mainly wedge‐shaped and line a furrow, whereas L cells are tall and mainly spindle‐shaped and do not line a furrow. Cell generation time also differs in these regions. These consistent differences are detectable only after the notochord has formed and established contact with the neural plate; it is unclear whether they result from self‐differentiation or induction. Two experiments were performed to evaluate the hypothesis that MHP characteristics develop owing to inductive interactions between the notochord and overlying neuroepithelial cells. First, notochordless chick embryos were generated to determine whether midline neuroepithelial cells still developed typical MHP characteristics. In the absence of the notochord, such characteristics did not develop. Second, isolated segments of quail notochord were transplanted subjacent to L of chick hosts to ascertain whether the notochord is capable of inducing MHP characteristics in L cells. When transplanted notochordal segments established apposition with host L cells, the apposing L cells usually developed typical MHP characteristics. Collectively, these results provide strong evidence that the notochord plays an inductive role in the formation of MHP characteristics. This investigation further revealed that bending can occur in the absence of MHP characteristics, forming a neural tube with an abnormal morphology. Thus, the formation of such characteristics, particularly cell wedging, is not required for bending but plays a major role in generating the normal cross‐sectional morphology of the neural tube.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Echelard, Y., Epstein, D. J., St-Jacques, B., Shen, L., Mohler, J., McMahon, J. A., & McMahon, A. P. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90627-3 · Cited by 2,154
Yamada, T., Placzek, M., Tanaka, H., Dodd, J., & Jessell, T. M. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90247-v · Cited by 707
Greene, N. D. E., & Copp, A. J. (2014) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170354 · Cited by 629
Yamada, T., Pfaff, S. L., Edlund, T., & Jessell, T. M. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90248-o · Cited by 465
Fate mapping and cell lineage analysis of Hensen’s node in the chick embryo
Selleck, M. A. J., & Stern, C. D. (1991) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.112.2.615 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, J. L., & Schoenwolf, G. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Zoology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-04
- Volume
- 250
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-62
- ISSN
- 0022-104X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-010X
- OpenAlex
- W2034923907
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Notochordal induction of cell wedging in the chick neural plate and its role in neural tube formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jez.1402500107
- The paper
- Smith, J. L., & Schoenwolf, G. C. (1989). Notochordal induction of cell wedging in the chick neural plate and its role in neural tube formation. Journal of Experimental Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402500107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.