Cited by 23Celiac Disease Research and ManagementChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesEosinophilic Esophagitis

Effect of gluten‐free diet and compliance on quality of life in pediatric celiac disease patients

Open access
Chellan, Deepak, Muktesh, Gaurav, Vaiphei, Kim, Berry, Neha, Dhaka, Narendra, Sinha, Saroj Kant, Thapa, Babu Ram, Kochhar, Rakesh·2019·JGH Open

Abstract

Background: Quality of life (QOL) in children with celiac disease (CD) has been sparsely studied. Aims: We aimed to study QOL in pediatric CD and the effect of a gluten‐free diet (GFD) in a North Indian population. Methods: QOL was assessed at baseline and 6 months after GFD using a pediatric symptom checklist (PSC) score. The effect of GFD was assessed using a CD‐specific questionnaire on domains such as dietary compliance, parental behavior and perceptions, children's feeling, and difficulty identifying gluten‐free foods. Results: A total of 60 CD children (age 6.03 ± 0. 42 years, range: 2–12 years, M:F 2:1) were prospectively enrolled. The median PSC score at baseline was 11.5 (2–35), which showed a statistically significant improvement after GFD to 2.5 (0–34) (P < 0.001). Significant concerns regarding specific domains emerged: difficulty in maintaining GFD 26.2%, at school 14.3%, at parties 43.2%, poor taste 11.4%, special diet a burden 28.5%, felt left out at school or friend's home 40.9%, felt different from other kids 40.9%, felt embarrassed to bring GFD to parties 54.6%, felt angry about following a special diet 56.8%, felt not invited out for meals because of CD 13.6%, and difficulty determining if food available was gluten free in 75%. Conclusion: GFD has a significant impact on emotional, behavioral, and psychosocial domains in children with CD. Proper labeling of commercially available food items, counseling, and patient support groups are the need of the hour.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jgh3.12172

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-adequate labelling of food products is widely recognised as a barrier for adhering to a gluten-free diet, especially in countries such as the USA and India where regulations are less strict than in the European Union.

    “Non-adequate labelling of food products is widely recognised as a barrier for adhering to a GFD, especially in countries such as the USA (regulations in 2004) (42) and India (43,44) where regulations are less strict than in the European Union.”

    From Gluten-free diet for pediatric patients with coeliac disease: A position paper from the ESPGHAN gastroenterology committee, special interest group in coeliac disease. (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Discussion (page not supplied) says that absent food labeling is a common problem for children with celiac disease and that proper labeling is not performed in India. It contrasts this with more stringent policies in Western countries, but does not specifically compare Indian regulations with those of the European Union. The USA portion has a separate citation in the citing sentence and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. [1]Parzanese I, Qehajaj D, Patrinicola F et al. Celiac disease: from pathophysiology to treatment. World J. Gastrointest. Pathophysiol. 2017; 8: 27– 38. 28573065 PMC5437500
  2. [2]Ramakrishna BS, Makharia GK, Chetri K et al. Prevalence of adult celiac disease in India: regional variations and associations. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2016; 111: 115– 23. 26729543
  3. [3]Abbas Z, Raza S, Yakoob J et al. Varied presentation of celiac disease in Pakistani adults. J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak. 2013; 23: 522– 4. 23823965
  4. [4]Rostami Nejad M, Rostami K, Emami M, Zali M, Malekzadeh R. Epidemiology of celiac disease in Iran: a review. Middle East J. Dig. Dis. 2011; 3: 5– 12. 25197526 PMC4154929
  5. [6]Byström I‐M, Hollén E, Fälth‐Magnusson K, Johansson A. Health‐related quality of life in children and adolescents with celiac disease: from the perspectives of children and parents. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2012; 2012: 1– 6. PMC3324145 22548054
  6. [7]Esenyel S, Unal F, Vural P. Depression and anxiety in child and adolescents with follow‐up celiac disease and in their families. Turk. J. Gastroenterol. 2014; 25: 381– 5. 25254519
  7. [8]Tack GJ, van de Water JMW, Bruins MJ et al. Consumption of gluten with gluten‐degrading enzyme by celiac patients: a pilot‐study. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013; 19: 5837– 47. 24124328 PMC3793137
  8. [9]Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36‐item short‐form health survey (SF‐36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med. Care. 1992; 30: 473– 83. 1593914
  9. [10]Connolly MA, Johnson JA. Measuring quality of life in paediatric patients. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999; 16: 605– 25. 10724790
  10. [11]Usherwood TP, Scrimgeour A, Barber JH. Questionnaire to measure perceived symptoms and disability in asthma. Arch. Dis. Child. 1990; 65: 779– 81. 2143643 PMC1792433
  11. [12]Jellinek MS, Murphy JM, Little M, Pagano ME, Comer DM, Kelleher KJ. Use of the pediatric symptom checklist to screen for psychosocial problems in pediatric primary care: a national feasibility study. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 1999; 153: 254– 60. 10086402 PMC3905751
  12. [13]Rashid M, Cranney A, Zarkadas M et al. Celiac disease: evaluation of the diagnosis and dietary compliance in Canadian children. Pediatrics. 2005; 116: e754– 9. 16322131
  13. [14]Chauhan JC, Kumar P, Dutta AK, Basu S, Kumar A. Assessment of dietary compliance to gluten free diet and psychosocial problems in Indian children with celiac disease. Indian J. Pediatr. 2010; 77: 649– 54. 20532683
  14. [15]Ljungman G, Myrdal U. Compliance in teenagers with coeliac disease—a Swedish follow‐up study. Acta Paediatr. 1993; 82: 235– 8. 8495075 PMC7188325
  15. [16]Garg A, Gupta R. Predictors of compliance to gluten‐free diet in children with celiac disease. Int. Sch. Res. Notices. 2014 Article number: 248402. Cited 27 Sep 2018. Available from URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897434/. PMC4897434 27351010
  16. [17]Terrone G, Parente I, Romano A, Auricchio R, Greco L, Del Giudice E. The pediatric symptom checklist as screening tool for neurological and psychosocial problems in a paediatric cohort of patients with coeliac disease. Acta Paediatr. 2013; 102: e325– 8. 23521635
  17. [18]Roma E, Roubani A, Kolia E, Panayiotou J, Zellos A, Syriopoulou VP. Dietary compliance and life style of children with coeliac disease. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2010; 23: 176– 82. 20163513
  18. [19]Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay‐Szabó IR et al. European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2012; 54: 136– 60. 22197856
  19. [20]Boyle MH, Offord DR, Racine Y, Sanford M, Szatmari P, Fleming JE. Evaluation of the original Ontario Child Health Study scales. Can. J. Psychiatry. 1993; 38: 397– 405. 8402433
  20. [21]Lindström B, Eriksson B. Quality of life among children in the Nordic countries. Qual. Life Res. 1993; 2: 23– 32. 8490614
  21. [22]Vogels T, Verrips GH, Verloove‐Vanhorick SP et al. Measuring health‐related quality of life in children: the development of the TACQOL parent form. Qual. Life Res. 1998; 7: 457– 65. 9691725
  22. [23]Su C‐T, Wang J‐D, Lin C‐Y. Child‐rated versus parent‐rated quality of life of community‐based obese children across gender and grade. Health Qual. Life Outcomes. 2013; 11: 206. 24325683 PMC4029491
  23. [24]Theunissen NC, Vogels TG, Koopman HM et al. The proxy problem: child report versus parent report in health‐related quality of life research. Qual. Life Res. 1998; 7: 387– 97. 9691719
  24. [25]Barr R, Pai M, Weitzman S et al. A multiattribute approach to health‐status measurement and clinical management illustrated by an application to brain‐tumors in childhood. Int. J. Oncol. 1994; 4: 639– 48. 21566971
  25. [27]Anson O, Weizman Z, Zeevi N. Celiac disease: parental knowledge and attitudes of dietary compliance. Pediatrics. 1990; 85: 98– 103. 2296499
  26. [28]Food and Drug Administration. HHS. Food labeling: gluten‐free labeling of foods. Final rule. Fed. Regist. 2013; 78: 47154– 79. 23923139

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chellan, D., Muktesh, G., Vaiphei, K., Berry, N., Dhaka, N., Sinha, S. K., Thapa, B. R., & Kochhar, R.
Affiliations
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
Corresponding author
Kochhar, Rakesh
Venue
JGH Open
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-03-27
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
388-393
ISSN
2397-9070 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2933037059
Cited by
23
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JGH Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Keywords
pediatric celiac disease, gluten-free diet, dietary adherence, quality of life, psychosocial impact, social isolation, food labeling, emotional burden, North Indian children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review