The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Different behavior of branched and linear polyethylenimine for gene deliveryin vitro andin vivo
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Efficient gene transfer is a major challenge for non-viral gene therapy. Understanding how non-viral vectors initiate gene expression could lead to the development of new future vectors with enhanced efficacy. METHODS: Linear or branched polyethylenimine (PEI)/DNA complexes were generated in varying salt conditions and their transfection efficiencies were compared in vitro and in vivo using reporter genes, luciferase and green fluorescent protein, and rhodamine labeled DNA (pGeneGrip). RESULTS: The transfection efficiency of linear PEI22/DNA in vitro was generally greater than that of branched PEI/DNA when complexes were generated in salt containing buffer. However, PEI complexes generated under salt-free conditions generally had low transfection activity in vitro. In contrast, PEI22/DNA salt-free complexes were highly active in vivo. Branched PEI/DNA and salt containing PEI22/DNA complexes were generally 10-100-fold less active than the salt-free PEI22/DNA complexes. Salt-free PEI22/DNA complexes were small, but subsequently grew into aggregates when salt was added. In contrast, PEI25/DNA complexes remained small even after salt was added under the same conditions. Furthermore, PEI22/pGeneGrips complexes formed large aggregates associated with the cell membrane, cytoplasm and nucleus, while branched PEI complexes remained as small distinct particles associated with the cell membrane or in the cytoplasm. CONCLUSIONS: Branched and linear PEI/DNA complexes differ in their ability to transfect cells. The greater efficiency of linear PEI might be due to an inherent kinetic instability under salt conditions. Understanding how to employ this kinetic instability of linear PEI could help in designing future vectors with greater flexibility and transfection efficiency in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ogris, M., Brunner, S., Schüller, S., Kircheis, R., & Wagner, E. (1999) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3300900 · Cited by 1,178
Self-citationDash, P. R., Read, M. L., Barrett, L. B., Wolfert, M. A., & Seymour, L. W. (1999) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3300843 · Cited by 386
Cited by
The dawning era of polymer therapeutics
Duncan, R. (2003) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1088 · Cited by 3,269
Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy
Yin, H., Kanasty, R. L., Eltoukhy, A. A., Vegas, A. J., Dorkin, J. R., & Anderson, D. G. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3763 · Cited by 3,123
Nonviral vectors for gene delivery
Mintzer, M. A., & Simanek, E. E. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr800409e · Cited by 2,366
Gene Therapy Progress and Prospects: Nonviral vectors
Niidome, T., & Huang, L. (2002) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3301923 · Cited by 963
Mendes, B. B., Conniot, J., Avital, A., Yao, D., Jiang, X., Zhou, X., Sharf-Pauker, N., Xiao, Y., Adir, O., Liang, H., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00104-y · Cited by 719
Metadata
- Authors
- Wightman, L., Kircheis, R., R�ssler, V., Carotta, S., Ruzicka, R., Kursa, M., & Wagner, E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Gene Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 362-372
- ISSN
- 1099-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1521-2254
- OpenAlex
- W2002151233
- Cited by
- 697
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Different behavior of branched and linear polyethylenimine for gene deliveryin vitro andin vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jgm.187
- The paper
- Wightman, L., Kircheis, R., R�ssler, V., Carotta, S., Ruzicka, R., Kursa, M., & Wagner, E. (2001). Different behavior of branched and linear polyethylenimine for gene deliveryin vitro andin vivo. The Journal of Gene Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgm.187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.