Cited by 87

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The 2011 Mw 7.1 Van (Eastern Turkey) earthquake

Elliott, J.R., Copley, A.C., Holley, R., Scharer, K., Parsons, B.·2013·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

We use interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR), body wave seismology, satellite imagery, and field observations to constrain the fault parameters of the Mw 7.1 2011 Van (Eastern Turkey) reverse‐slip earthquake, in the Turkish‐Iranian plateau. Distributed slip models from elastic dislocation modeling of the InSAR surface displacements from ENVISAT and COSMO‐SkyMed interferograms indicate up to 9 m of reverse and oblique slip on a pair of en echelon NW 40 °–54 ° dipping fault planes which have surface extensions projecting to just 10 km north of the city of Van. The slip remained buried and is relatively deep, with a centroid depth of 14 km, and the rupture reaching only within 8–9 km of the surface, consistent with the lack of significant ground rupture. The up‐dip extension of this modeled WSW striking fault plane coincides with field observations of weak ground deformation seen on the western of the two fault segments and has a dip consistent with that seen at the surface in fault gouge exposed in Quaternary sediments. No significant coseismic slip is found in the upper 8 km of the crust above the main slip patches, except for a small region on the eastern segment potentially resulting from the Mw 5.9 aftershock on the same day. We perform extensive resolution tests on the data to confirm the robustness of the observed slip deficit in the shallow crust. We resolve a steep gradient in displacement at the point where the planes of the two fault segments ends are inferred to abut at depth, possibly exerting some structural control on rupture extent.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jgrb.50117

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent and historical destructive earthquakes in other cratonic regions (Australia, China, Turkey) demonstrate the necessity of similar studies in regions such as eastern Canada.

    “Nonetheless, recent and historical destructive earthquakes in other cratonic regions e.g., Australia (Gold et al. 2019, King et al. 2021); China (Kirby et al. 2008, D r a f t Fielding et al. 2013b); and Turkey (Elliott et al. 2013, Fielding et al. 2013a) demonstrate the necessity of similar studies in regions such as eastern Canada.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 10.1785/0220110146 · DOI
  2. Altinli I. E., 1966, Geology of eastern and southeastern Anatolia, Bull. Miner. Res. Explor. Inst. Turk., 66, 35
  3. 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.1989.tb04453.X · DOI
  4. 10.1046/j.0956‐540X.2001.01396.X · DOI
  5. Ambraseys N. N., 1995, The Seismicity of Turkey and Adjacent Areas: A Historical Review, 1500
  6. 10.1785/BSSA0580010047 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2011.04955.X · DOI
  8. 10.1029/2010TC002808 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.1984.tb02223.X · DOI
  10. 10.1046/j.1365‐246X.2001.01459.X · DOI
  11. 10.1029/2001GC000252 · DOI
  12. 10.1029/2005TC001906 · DOI
  13. 10.1029/2008JB005931 · DOI
  14. 10.5194/nhess‐11‐2235‐2011 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2009.04491.X · DOI
  16. 10.1785/BSSA0870051259 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.pepi.2004.09.006 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2010.04754.X · DOI
  19. 10.1029/2011GL046897 · DOI
  20. 10.1029/2011JB008868 · DOI
  21. 10.1029/JB091iB03p03664 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s11069‐012‐0263‐9 · DOI
  23. 10.1029/2003JB002756 · DOI
  24. 10.1029/2004JB003338 · DOI
  25. 10.1029/2003GL018020 · DOI
  26. Hudnut K. W., 1996, Co‐seismic displacements of the 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86, S19, 10.1785/BSSA08601B0S19 · DOI
  27. 10.1029/92JB00944 · DOI
  28. 10.1046/j.1365‐246X.2002.01588.X · DOI
  29. King G. C. P., 1994, Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84, 935
  30. 10.1002/jqs.1431 · DOI
  31. Lemoine F. E., 1996, The NASA and DMA joint geopotential mode, Eos Trans. AGU, 77
  32. 10.1029/2003JB002607 · DOI
  33. 10.1029/2004GC000849 · DOI
  34. 10.1029/2004GC000841 · DOI
  35. 10.1029/96GL00729 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.1972.tb02351.X · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1029/2003GL017992 · DOI
  38. Mitra S., 1990, Fault‐propagation folds; geometry, kinematic evolution, and hydrocarbon traps, Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., 74, 921
  39. 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.1989.tb02020.X · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.04.049 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2011.05119.X · DOI
  42. Ozkaymak C., 2004, The Fifth International Symposium on Eastern Mediterranean Geology
  43. 10.1029/2007JB005449 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/0377‐0273(90)90018‐B · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2007.03636.X · DOI
  46. 10.1029/2005JB004051 · DOI
  47. Saroglu F., 1982, Tectonic and sedimentary character of the Mus‐Van basin, SE Turkey, Eos Trans. AGU, 63, 442
  48. 10.1017/CBO9780511818516 · DOI
  49. 10.2475/ajs.283.7.684 · DOI
  50. 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2008.04024.X · DOI
  51. 10.1029/98EO00426 · DOI
  52. 10.1785/0120040623 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Elliott, J. R., Copley, A. C., Holley, R., Scharer, K., & Parsons, B.
Affiliations
  • COMET+, Department of Earth Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK
  • COMET+, Department of Earth Sciences Bullard Laboratories Cambridge UK
  • CGG NPA Edenbridge Kent UK
  • USGS Pasadena California USA
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
2013-04
Volume
118
Issue
4
Pages
1619-1637
ISSN
  • 2169-9313
  • 2169-9356
Cited by
87
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review