The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The 2011 Mw 7.1 Van (Eastern Turkey) earthquake
Abstract
We use interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR), body wave seismology, satellite imagery, and field observations to constrain the fault parameters of the Mw 7.1 2011 Van (Eastern Turkey) reverse‐slip earthquake, in the Turkish‐Iranian plateau. Distributed slip models from elastic dislocation modeling of the InSAR surface displacements from ENVISAT and COSMO‐SkyMed interferograms indicate up to 9 m of reverse and oblique slip on a pair of en echelon NW 40 °–54 ° dipping fault planes which have surface extensions projecting to just 10 km north of the city of Van. The slip remained buried and is relatively deep, with a centroid depth of 14 km, and the rupture reaching only within 8–9 km of the surface, consistent with the lack of significant ground rupture. The up‐dip extension of this modeled WSW striking fault plane coincides with field observations of weak ground deformation seen on the western of the two fault segments and has a dip consistent with that seen at the surface in fault gouge exposed in Quaternary sediments. No significant coseismic slip is found in the upper 8 km of the crust above the main slip patches, except for a small region on the eastern segment potentially resulting from the Mw 5.9 aftershock on the same day. We perform extensive resolution tests on the data to confirm the robustness of the observed slip deficit in the shallow crust. We resolve a steep gradient in displacement at the point where the planes of the two fault segments ends are inferred to abut at depth, possibly exerting some structural control on rupture extent.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent and historical destructive earthquakes in other cratonic regions (Australia, China, Turkey) demonstrate the necessity of similar studies in regions such as eastern Canada.
“Nonetheless, recent and historical destructive earthquakes in other cratonic regions e.g., Australia (Gold et al. 2019, King et al. 2021); China (Kirby et al. 2008, D r a f t Fielding et al. 2013b); and Turkey (Elliott et al. 2013, Fielding et al. 2013a) demonstrate the necessity of similar studies in regions such as eastern Canada.”
From Tectonic geomorphology of the Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben, Eastern Canada: implications for regional uplift and intraplate seismicity (2023) · cites this paper as Elliott et al. 2013
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- 10.1785/0220110146 · DOI
- Altinli I. E., 1966, Geology of eastern and southeastern Anatolia, Bull. Miner. Res. Explor. Inst. Turk., 66, 35
- 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.1989.tb04453.X · DOI
- 10.1046/j.0956‐540X.2001.01396.X · DOI
- Ambraseys N. N., 1995, The Seismicity of Turkey and Adjacent Areas: A Historical Review, 1500
- 10.1785/BSSA0580010047 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2011.04955.X · DOI
- 10.1029/2010TC002808 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.1984.tb02223.X · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365‐246X.2001.01459.X · DOI
- 10.1029/2001GC000252 · DOI
- 10.1029/2005TC001906 · DOI
- 10.1029/2008JB005931 · DOI
- 10.5194/nhess‐11‐2235‐2011 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2009.04491.X · DOI
- 10.1785/BSSA0870051259 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pepi.2004.09.006 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2010.04754.X · DOI
- 10.1029/2011GL046897 · DOI
- 10.1029/2011JB008868 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB091iB03p03664 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11069‐012‐0263‐9 · DOI
- 10.1029/2003JB002756 · DOI
- 10.1029/2004JB003338 · DOI
- 10.1029/2003GL018020 · DOI
- Hudnut K. W., 1996, Co‐seismic displacements of the 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86, S19, 10.1785/BSSA08601B0S19 · DOI
- 10.1029/92JB00944 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365‐246X.2002.01588.X · DOI
- King G. C. P., 1994, Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84, 935
- 10.1002/jqs.1431 · DOI
- Lemoine F. E., 1996, The NASA and DMA joint geopotential mode, Eos Trans. AGU, 77
- 10.1029/2003JB002607 · DOI
- 10.1029/2004GC000849 · DOI
- 10.1029/2004GC000841 · DOI
- 10.1029/96GL00729 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.1972.tb02351.X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1029/2003GL017992 · DOI
- Mitra S., 1990, Fault‐propagation folds; geometry, kinematic evolution, and hydrocarbon traps, Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., 74, 921
- 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.1989.tb02020.X · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.04.049 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2011.05119.X · DOI
- Ozkaymak C., 2004, The Fifth International Symposium on Eastern Mediterranean Geology
- 10.1029/2007JB005449 · DOI
- 10.1016/0377‐0273(90)90018‐B · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2007.03636.X · DOI
- 10.1029/2005JB004051 · DOI
- Saroglu F., 1982, Tectonic and sedimentary character of the Mus‐Van basin, SE Turkey, Eos Trans. AGU, 63, 442
- 10.1017/CBO9780511818516 · DOI
- 10.2475/ajs.283.7.684 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2008.04024.X · DOI
- 10.1029/98EO00426 · DOI
- 10.1785/0120040623 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gusti, U. K., Peace, A. L., & Rimando, J. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjes-2022-0137 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Elliott, J. R., Copley, A. C., Holley, R., Scharer, K., & Parsons, B.
- Affiliations
- COMET+, Department of Earth Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK
- COMET+, Department of Earth Sciences Bullard Laboratories Cambridge UK
- CGG NPA Edenbridge Kent UK
- USGS Pasadena California USA
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1619-1637
- ISSN
- 2169-9313
- 2169-9356
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review