Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of simulation‐based mastery learning to improve the quality of central venous catheter placement in a medical intensive care unit

Barsuk, Jeffrey H., McGaghie, William C., Cohen, Elaine R., Balachandran, Jayshankar S., Wayne, Diane B.·2009·Journal of Hospital Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheter (CVC) insertions are performed frequently by internal medicine residents. Complications, including arterial puncture and pneumothorax, decrease when operators use fewer needle passes to insert the CVC. In this study, we evaluated the effect of simulation‐based mastery learning on CVC insertion skill. DESIGN: This was a cohort study of internal jugular (IJ) and subclavian (SC) CVC insertions by 41 internal medicine residents rotating through the medical intensive care unit (MICU) over a five‐month period. Thirteen traditionally‐trained residents were surveyed about the number of needle passes, complications, and procedural self‐confidence on CVCs inserted in the MICU. Concurrently, 28 residents completed simulation‐based training in IJ and SC CVC insertions. Simulator‐trained residents were expected to perform CVC insertions to mastery standards on a central line simulator. Simulator‐trained residents then rotated through the MICU and were surveyed regarding CVC placement. The impact of simulation training was assessed by comparing group survey results. RESULTS: No resident met the minimum passing score (MPS) (79.1%) for CVC insertion at baseline: mean (M) (IJ) = 48.4%, standard deviation (SD) = 23.1, M(SC) = 45.2%, SD = 26.3. All residents met or exceeded the MPS at testing after simulation training: M(IJ) = 94.8%, SD = 10.0, M(SC) = 91.1%, SD = 17.8 (p < 0.001). In the MICU, simulator‐trained residents required fewer needle passes to insert a CVC than traditionally‐trained residents: M = 1.79, SD = 1.0 versus M = 2.78, SD = 1.77 (p = 0.04). Simulator‐trained residents displayed more self‐confidence about their procedural skills: (M = 81, SD = 11 versus M = 68, SD = 20, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation‐based mastery learning increased residents' skills in simulated CVC insertion, decreased the number of needle passes when performing actual procedures, and increased resident self‐confidence. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2009;4:397–403. © 2009 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jhm.468

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 405

Metadata

Authors
Barsuk, J. H., McGaghie, W. C., Cohen, E. R., Balachandran, J. S., & Wayne, D. B.
Venue
Journal of Hospital Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09
Volume
4
Issue
7
Pages
397-403
ISSN
  • 1553-5592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-5606
OpenAlex
W1976616424
Cited by
405
References
43
FWCI
12.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of simulation‐based mastery learning to improve the quality of central venous catheter placement in a medical intensive care unit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jhm.468
The paper
Barsuk, J. H., McGaghie, W. C., Cohen, E. R., Balachandran, J. S., & Wayne, D. B. (2009). Use of simulation‐based mastery learning to improve the quality of central venous catheter placement in a medical intensive care unit. Journal of Hospital Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.468

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.