Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 988

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit*

Berenholtz, Sean M., Pronovost, Peter J., Lipsett, Pamela A., Hobson, Deborah, Earsing, Karen, Farley, Jason E., Milanovich, Shelley, Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth, Winters, Bradford D., Rubin, Haya R., Dorman, Todd, Perl, Trish M.·2004·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a multifaceted systems intervention would eliminate catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) with a concurrent control ICU. SETTING: The Johns Hopkins Hospital. PATIENTS: All patients with a central venous catheter in the ICU. INTERVENTION: To eliminate CR-BSIs, a quality improvement team implemented five interventions: educating the staff; creating a catheter insertion cart; asking providers daily whether catheters could be removed; implementing a checklist to ensure adherence to evidence-based guidelines for preventing CR-BSIs; and empowering nurses to stop the catheter insertion procedure if a violation of the guidelines was observed. MEASUREMENT: The primary outcome variable was the rate of CR-BSIs per 1,000 catheter days from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2002. Secondary outcome variables included adherence to evidence-based infection control guidelines during catheter insertion. MAIN RESULTS: Before the intervention, we found that physicians followed infection control guidelines during 62% of the procedures. During the intervention time period, the CR-BSI rate in the study ICU decreased from 11.3/1,000 catheter days in the first quarter of 1998 to 0/1,000 catheter days in the fourth quarter of 2002. The CR-BSI rate in the control ICU was 5.7/1,000 catheter days in the first quarter of 1998 and 1.6/1,000 catheter days in the fourth quarter of 2002 (p = .56). We estimate that these interventions may have prevented 43 CR-BSIs, eight deaths, and 1,945,922 dollars in additional costs per year in the study ICU. CONCLUSIONS: Multifaceted interventions that helped to ensure adherence with evidence-based infection control guidelines nearly eliminated CR-BSIs in our surgical ICU.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000142399.70913.2f

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 988

Metadata

Authors
Berenholtz, S. M., Pronovost, P. J., Lipsett, P. A., Hobson, D., Earsing, K., Farley, J. E., Milanovich, S., Garrett-Mayer, E., Winters, B. D., Rubin, H. R., Dorman, T., & Perl, T. M.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2004-10
Volume
32
Issue
10
Pages
2014-2020
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051635148
Cited by
988
References
19
FWCI
59.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000142399.70913.2f
The paper
Berenholtz, S. M., Pronovost, P. J., Lipsett, P. A., Hobson, D., Earsing, K., Farley, J. E., Milanovich, S., Garrett-Mayer, E., Winters, B. D., Rubin, H. R., Dorman, T., & Perl, T. M. (2004). Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000142399.70913.2f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.