Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Function of the digastric muscle in carnivores

Scapino, Robert P.·1976·Journal of Morphology
DOI 10.1002/jmor.1051500405
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The general form and adaptation of the digastric muscle in carnivores are reviewed and discussed. The digastric muscle differs from the general plan in certain aquatic carnivores and felids. In the pertinent aquatic species the muscle is enlarged. The observations suggest that the enlargement is an adaptation for rapidly opening the jaws against the resistance of water. In felids, the insertion of the muscle is much farther forward than in most other carnivores. The observations suggest that the development of short jaws in felids necessitated a compensatory anterior relocation of the digastric insertion in order to preserve the ability to achieve a large gape.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmor.1051500405

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Adams L. A., 1919, A memoir on the phylogeny of the jaw muscles in recent and fossil vertebrates, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 28, 519
  2. Alder A. B., 1958, The growth of the muscle tibialis anterior in the normal rabbit in relation to the tension‐length ratio, Proc. Roy. Soc, (London), Ser. B., 48, 519
  3. 10.1515/mamm.1967.31.3.459 · DOI
  4. Bijvoet W. F., 1908, Zur vergleichenden Morphologie des musculus digastricus mandibulae bei den Säugetieren, Z. Morph. Anthrop., 11, 519
  5. Buller A. J., 1963, The Effect of Use and Disuse on Neuromuscular Functions, 149
  6. Chaine J., 1914, Le digastrique, J. Anat. Physiol., (Paris), 50, 519
  7. Davis D. D., 1955, Masticatory apparatus in the spectacled bear, Tremarctos ornatus, Fieldiana, Zool., 37, 519
  8. 10.2307/3565013 · DOI
  9. 10.1159/000140831 · DOI
  10. Fisher E. M., 1942, The Osteology and Myology of the California River Otter, 66
  11. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1966.tb03008.x · DOI
  12. Gans C., 1965, The functional significance of muscle architecture—a theoretical analysis, Ergebn. Anat. EntwGesch., 38, 519
  13. 10.1515/mamm.1964.28.2.249 · DOI
  14. Gaspard M., 1971, Anatomie comparative et fonctionnelle de la musculature masticatrice chez les carnivores, Mem. Mus. natn. Hist. nat., Paris. N. S., Ser. A., Zool., 63, 519
  15. Hall E. R., 1959, The Mammals of North America
  16. Harris C. J., 1968, Otters
  17. Haughton Rev. S., 1864, Notes on animal mechanics, No. V. The muscular anatomy of the seal. Proc. R. Ir. Acad., Ser. 1, 9, 519
  18. Herring S. W., 1975, Adaptations for gape in the hippopotamus and its relatives, Forma et functio, 8, 519
  19. Hiiemae K., 1971, Dental Morphology and Evolution
  20. Howell A. B., 1929, Contribution to the comparative anatomy of the eared and earless seals (genera Zalophus and Phoca), Proc. U. S. natn. Mus., No. 2736, 73, art., 15, 519
  21. Hughes H. V., 1946, The digastricus muscle of the dog, Vet. Rec., 58, 262
  22. 10.1002/jmor.1051360402 · DOI
  23. Kenyon K. W.1969The Sea Otter in the Eastern Pacific Ocean. North Am. Fauna No. 68. Bureau Spt. Fish. Wildl. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kosygin G. M., 1968, Pinnipeds of the North Pacific, 519
  25. Kurtén B., 1952, The Chinese Hipparion fauna. A quantitative survey with comments on the ecology of the machairodonts and hyaenids and taxonomy of the gazelles, Soc. Sci. Fennica, Comm. Biol., 13, 519
  26. Lucae J. C. G., 1872, Die Robbe und die Otter in ihrem Knochen und Muskelet: eine anatomische‐zoologische Studie, Abh. senckenb. naturforsch. Ges., 9, 519
  27. Luciv A., 1951, Ueber die Kaumuskulatur des Haushundes unter besonderer Berucksichtigung verschiedener Korperwuchsformen
  28. Mackintosh H. W.1874Notes on the myology of the coati‐mondi: (Nasua narica and N. fusca) and common martin (Martes foina). Proc. R. Ir. Acad. 2 (ser 2):519–531.
  29. Meckel J. F., 1829, System der vergleichenden Anatomie
  30. Miller M. E., 1964, Anatomy of the Dog
  31. 10.2535/ofaj1936.31.3-4_203 · DOI
  32. Murie J., 1871, Researches upon the anatomy of the Pinnipedia. Part I, On the Walrus (Trichechus rosmarus, Linn.). Trans. zool. Soc. (London), 7, 519
  33. Murie J., 1872, Researches upon the anatomy of the Pinnipedia Part II. Descriptive anatomy of the sealion (Otaria jubata), Trans. zool. Soc. (London), 7, 519
  34. Nickel R., 1961, Lehrbuch der Anatomie der Haustiere
  35. Parsons F. G., 1898, The muscles of mammals, with special relation to human myology, J. Anat. Physiol., (London), 32, 519
  36. Poliakova R. S., 1974, The comparative morphology of the masticatory apparatus of the Mustelidae, Trudy zool. Inst., Akad. nauk SSSR., 54, 519
  37. Pooie T. B., 1976, Underwater predatory behavior of the American mink (Mustelatison), J. Zool., (London), 178, 519
  38. Preissecker O., 1938, Anatomisch‐histologische Untersuchungen an Kiefergelenken von Hunden in normalem und nach gehobenem Biss, Z. Stomat., 36, 519
  39. Rouvière H., 1906, Etude sur le développement phylogénique de certains muscles sus‐hyoidiens, J. Anat. Physiol. (Paris), 42, 519
  40. Schumacher G.‐H., 1961, Funktionelle Morphologie der Kaumuskulatur
  41. 10.2307/1377419 · DOI
  42. Starck D., 1935, Kaumuskulatur und Kiefergelenk der Ursiden, Morph. Jb., 76, 519
  43. Stern J. T., 1971, Functional myology of the hip and thigh of cebid monkeys and its implications for the evolution of erect posture
  44. Testut L., 1890, Myologie de l'Ursus americanus, Int. Mschr. Anat. Physiol., 7, 519
  45. Thiel W., 1955, Die Tiefe Facialmuskulatur und die Hyoidverbindung des Musculus biventer der Säugetiere, Morph. Jb., 94, 519
  46. Toldt C., 1905, Die Winkel fortsatz des Unterkiefers beim Menschen und bei den Säugetieren und die Beziehungen der Kaumusklen zu demselben. II. Teil, Sitzungsberg. K. Akad, Will. Wein, Math.‐naturw. Kl., 114, 519
  47. Turnbull W. D., 1970, Mammalian masticatory apparatus, Fieldiana, Geol., 18, 519
  48. 10.1002/jmor.1051280304 · DOI
  49. Vitti M., 1965, Estudo electromiográfico dos músculos mastigadores no cão, Folia clin. biol., 34, 519
  50. Windle B. C. A. andF. G.Parsons1897On the myology of the terrestrial Carnivora Part I. Muscles of the head neck and forelimb. Proc zool. Soc. (London) pp.370–409. · DOI
  51. Young A. H., 1879, Myology of Viverra civetta, J. Anat., 14, 519
  52. Zierler K. L., 1974, Medical Physiology. V. Mountcastle

Cited by

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Scapino, R. P.
Venue
Journal of Morphology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1976-12
Volume
150
Issue
4
Pages
843-859
ISSN
  • 0362-2525
  • 1097-4687
DOI
10.1002/jmor.1051500405
Cited by
28
References
1
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 10294 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review