The giant panda : a morphological study of evolutionary mechanisms / D. Dwight Davis.
Open accessAbstract
Relative weights of masticatory muscles in carnivores 14.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The stomach of L. culpaeus contrasts with ursid species such as the giant panda, which has an elongate and slender stomach.
“It contrasts from ursid species (Carnivora, Ursidae), as the giant panda Ailuropoda melanoleuca (A.David, 1869), which has an elongate and slender stomach (Davis, 1964).”
From The Andean fox Lycalopex culpaeus (Molina, 1782) in southwestern Colombia: diet and anatomical description (2026) · cites this paper as Davis, 1964
The Relationships of Ailuropoda section identifies the giant panda as a bear, but the passages found do not describe its stomach. Searches for “stomach” and terms for an elongate, slender digestive organ found no relevant passage; the copy is truncated, so the description cannot be verified from it. (LLM, conf=0.68)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 1918, pp. 63-136, 12 figs., pis. 4-5.
- Albrecht, Heixrich 1896. Beitrag zur vergleichenden Anatomie des Sauge- thierkehlkopfes. Sitzungsber. K. .\kad. Wiss. Wien (Math.-Naturw.\ 105 (3), pp. 227-322, 1 fig., 7 pis.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mammalian intestinal allometry, phylogeny, trophic level and climate
Duque-Correa, M. J., Codron, D., Meloro, C., McGrosky, A., Schiffmann, C., Edwards, M. S., & Clauss, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.2888 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Rosero-Taramuel, J. L., Arboleda-Osorio, J. J., Guerrero-Diaz, A. F., Jimenez Anacona, F. D., Matabanchoy-C, K., Pisso-Florez, G. A., & Ramírez-Chaves, H. E. (2026) · Notas sobre Mamíferos Sudamericanos · doi:10.31687/saremnms26.1305
- Authors
- Davis, D. D.
- Corresponding author
- Davis, D. Dwight
- Venue
- Field Museum of Natural History eBooks
- Publisher
- Chicago Natural History Museum,
- Published
- 1964
- OpenAlex
- W2496423141
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Field Museum of Natural History eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Keywords
- giant panda, morphological evolution, evolutionary processes, masticatory muscles, comparative anatomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
