Cited by 72Endometriosis Research and TreatmentUterine Myomas and TreatmentsGynecological conditions and treatments

MR imaging of diffuse adenomyosis changes after GnRH analog therapy

Open access
Imaoka, Izumi, Ascher, Susan M., Sugimura, Kazuro, Takahashi, Kentaro, Li, Hong, Cuomo, Felicia, Simon, James, Arnold, Lori L.·2002·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate uterine changes on MRI before and after GnRH analog (GnRHa) treatment in diffuse adenomyosis. Materials and Methods: Thirty‐one patients with MRI features suggestive of diffuse adenomyosis received GnRHa for 6 months. Diffuse adenomyosis was sub‐classified as: symmetric (symmetric/ entire widening of the junctional zone [JZ]) and asymmetric (asymmetric/ partial widening of JZ). Pre‐ and post‐high signal intensity (SI) foci and JZ width, and post‐demarcated change (interface of adenomyosis with the myometrium became more discrete with a concomitant decrease in JZ width) were analyzed. Results: Before therapy, 15 of 18 asymmetric contained high SI foci compared to none of symmetric. After therapy, JZ width decreased (P < 0.0001). Eight asymmetric and none of symmetric showed demarcated change with resolved high SI foci. Conclusion: Our results suggest the use of GnRHa is associated with a decrease of JZ width in adenomyosis. Asymmetric adenomyosis with high SI foci appears to be the most sensitive to hormonal therapy. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2002;15:285–290. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmri.10060

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vercellini P, Ragni G, Trespidi L, Oldani S, Panazza S, Grosignani PG. Adenomyosis: a deja vu? Obstet Gynecol Surv 1993;48:789 - 794.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Imaoka, I., Ascher, S. M., Sugimura, K., Takahashi, K., Li, H., Cuomo, F., Simon, J., & Arnold, L. L.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
  • Kobe University (JP)
  • Shimane Medical University (JP)
  • Yale University (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Imaoka, Izumi
Venue
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-02-28
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
285-290
ISSN
  • 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2586
OpenAlex
W2013792071
Cited by
72
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
diffuse adenomyosis, GnRH analog therapy, hormone therapy response, uterine MRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Uterus, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review