The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion‐weighted imaging
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the value of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods: Fifty‐two female subjects (mean age = 58 years, age range = 25–75 years) with histopathologically proven breast lesions underwent DWI of the breasts with a single‐shot echo‐planar imaging (EPI) sequence using large b values. The computed mean apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of the breast lesions and cell density were then correlated. Results: The ADCs varied substantially between benign breast lesions ((1.57 ± 0.23) × 10−3 mm 2/second) and malignant breast lesions ((0.97 ± 0.20) × 10−3 mm 2/second). In addition, the mean ADCs of the breast lesions correlated well with tumor cellularity (P < 0.01, r = −0.542). Conclusion: The ADC would be an effective parameter in distinguishing between malignant and benign breast lesions. Further, tumor cellularity has a significant influence on the ADCs obtained in both benign and malignant breast tumors. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2002;16:172–178. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Le Bihan, D., Breton, E., Lallemand, D., Grenier, P., Cabanis, E., & Laval-Jeantet, M. (1986) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763909 · Cited by 3,912
Cited by
Clinical intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion MR imaging: Past, present, and future
Iima, M., & Le Bihan, D. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150244 · Cited by 498
Turkbey, B., Shah, V. P., Pang, Y., Bernardo, M., Xu, S., Kruecker, J., Locklin, J., Baccala, A. A., Rastinehad, A. R., Merino, M. J., et al. (2011) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.10100667 · Cited by 389
Nakayama, T., Yoshimitsu, K., Irie, H., Aibe, H., Tajima, T., Nishie, A., Asayama, Y., Matake, K., Kakihara, D., Matsuura, S., et al. (2005) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.20369 · Cited by 168
Fujii, S., Kakite, S., Nishihara, K., Kanasaki, Y., Harada, T., Kigawa, J., Kaminou, T., & Ogawa, T. (2008) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.21575 · Cited by 159
Breast Cancer Cell Invasion into a Three Dimensional Tumor-Stroma Microenvironment
Truong, D., Puleo, J., Llave, A., Mouneimne, G., Kamm, R. D., & Nikkhah, M. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep34094 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, Y., Cai, Y., Cai, Z., Gao, Y., An, N., Ma, L., Mahankali, S., & Gao, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-07-23
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 172-178
- ISSN
- 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2586
- OpenAlex
- W1989029379
- Cited by
- 714
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion‐weighted imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.10140
- The paper
- Guo, Y., Cai, Y., Cai, Z., Gao, Y., An, N., Ma, L., Mahankali, S., & Gao, J. (2002). Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion‐weighted imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
