Cited by 168MRI in cancer diagnosisTeratomas and Epidermoid CystsOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment

Diffusion‐weighted echo‐planar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cystic masses: Usefulness of detecting keratinoid substances in mature cystic teratomas

Open access
Nakayama, Tomohiro, Yoshimitsu, Kengo, Irie, Hiroyuki, Aibe, Hitoshi, Tajima, Tsuyoshi, Nishie, Akihiro, Asayama, Yoshiki, Matake, Kunishige +4 more·2005·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Purpose: To elucidate whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values calculated from echo‐planar diffusion‐weighted MR imaging (EPDWI) are useful in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cystic masses. Materials and Methods: EPDWI was performed in 131 patients with ovarian cystic masses (54 mature cystic teratomas, 35 endometrial cysts, four other benign cysts, 14 benign neoplasms, and 24 malignant neoplasms). The areas of the highest signal intensity on EPDWI (b = 1000 seconds/mm 2) and the lowest ADC values within the cystic component were evaluated. Results: On qualitative and quantitative analyses, mature cystic teratomas tended to show higher signal intensity and had areas of lower ADC values than endometrial cysts and other benign and malignant neoplasms (P < .005). In vitro scanning of the cystic contents of mature cystic teratomas confirmed that high signal on DWI or low ADC value was attributable to the keratinoid substance within the tumors. The difference in ADC between malignant and benign lesions were significant when mature cystic teratomas and endometrial cysts were included, but was not significant when they were excluded. Conclusion: The ADC value may add useful information to the differential diagnosis of ovarian cystic masses in limited populations, such as those with mature cystic teratomas with a small amount of fat. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2005;22:271–278. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmri.20369

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Regarding endometrial cysts, previous studies found a tendency towards lower ADC values compared with other pelvic cysts, which might be more closely related to blood concentration.

    “Regarding endometrial cysts, previous studies found a tendency towards lower apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values compared with other pelvic cysts, which might be more closely related to blood concentration [19–21].”

    From Appearance of abdominal wall endometriosis on MR imaging (2010) · cites this paper as [21]

  • This is comparable with previous reports on ADC values in endometrial cysts.

    “This is comparable with previous reports on ADC values in endometrial cysts [19, 21].”

    From Appearance of abdominal wall endometriosis on MR imaging (2010) · cites this paper as [21]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Moteki T, Ishizaka H. Diffusion-weighted EPI of cystic ovarian le- sions: evaluation of cystic contents using apparent diffusion coef- ficients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:1014 -1009.
  2. Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Kuroiwa T, et al. MR detection of cyto- plasmic fat in clear cell renal cell carcinoma utilizing chemical shift gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:579 - 585.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakayama, T., Yoshimitsu, K., Irie, H., Aibe, H., Tajima, T., Nishie, A., Asayama, Y., Matake, K., Kakihara, D., Matsuura, S., Nakano, H., & Honda, H.
Affiliations
Kyushu University (JP)
Corresponding author
Yoshimitsu, Kengo
Venue
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07-18
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
271-278
ISSN
  • 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2586
OpenAlex
W2061059585
Cited by
168
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Teratomas and Epidermoid Cysts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient, ovarian cystic mass, dermoid cyst, endometrioma, differential diagnosis, ovarian neoplasms
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Ovarian Cysts, Ovarian Neoplasms, Probability, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Teratoma, Cohort Studies, Echo-Planar Imaging, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review