Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Renal diffusion and BOLD MRI in experimental diabetic nephropathy

Ries, Mario, Basseau, Fabrice, Tyndal, Benoît, Jones, Richard, Deminière, Colette, Catargi, Bogdan, Combe, Christian, Moonen, Chrit W.T., Grenier, Nicolas·2003·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the possibility of using combined blood oxygen level‐dependent (BOLD) imaging and diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) to detect pathological and physiological changes in renal tissue damage of the kidney induced by chronic renal hyperfiltration. Materials and Methods: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and the T 2* value within the inner compartments of the kidneys of 17 rats with diabetes mellitus were compared with the results obtained from a control group (N = 16). The influence of dynamic changes of the renal function on the blood‐oxygen saturation was evaluated by comparing the T 2* values before and after the active reduction of tubular transport by furosemide injection. Results: All compartments of the diabetic kidney showed significantly (P < 0.05) lower T 2*‐values compared to the control group. In particular, the very low values in the outer stripe (OS) of the outer medulla (OM) (T 2*‐normal: 69.4 ± 10.9 msec; T 2*‐diabetic: 51.4 ± 13.9 msec) indicated either hypoxia due to hyperfiltration, or renal blood volume changes. Diffusion imaging of the same area showed significantly lower ADC values (ADC‐normal: 1.45 ± 0.26; ADC‐edema: 1.19 ± 0.25 [10–9 m 2/s]) that correlated with pathological findings on histopathology. The injection of furosemide significantly (P < 0.05) increased T 2* in all compartments of both populations while the ADC remained unchanged. Conclusion: BOLD‐contrast imaging appears to be able to depict tissue at risk from ischemia by revealing information about the balance between tubular workload and delivery of oxygen, and thus may reflect a measure of the reserve capacity. The diffusion measurements apparently reveal J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003;17:104–113. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmri.10224

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Ries, M., Basseau, F., Tyndal, B., Jones, R., Deminière, C., Catargi, B., Combe, C., Moonen, C. W. T., & Grenier, N.
Venue
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12-23
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
104-113
ISSN
  • 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2586
OpenAlex
W2072522516
Cited by
228
References
1
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Renal diffusion and BOLD MRI in experimental diabetic nephropathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.10224
The paper
Ries, M., Basseau, F., Tyndal, B., Jones, R., Deminière, C., Catargi, B., Combe, C., Moonen, C. W. T., & Grenier, N. (2003). Renal diffusion and BOLD MRI in experimental diabetic nephropathy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10224

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.