The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of gradient encoding schemes for diffusion‐tensor MRI
Open accessAbstract
The accuracy of single diffusion tensor MRI (DT‐MRI) measurements depends upon the encoding scheme used. In this study, the diffusion tensor accuracy of several strategies for DT‐MRI encoding are compared. The encoding strategies are based upon heuristic, numerically optimized, and regular polyhedra schemes. The criteria for numerical optimization include the minimum tensor variance (MV), minimum force (MF), minimum potential energy (ME), and minimum condition number. The regular polyhedra scheme includes variations of the icosahedron. Analytical comparisons and Monte Carlo simulations show that the icosahedron scheme is optimum for six encoding directions. The MV, MF, and ME solutions for six directions are functionally equivalent to the icosahedron scheme. Two commonly used heuristic DT‐MRI encoding schemes with six directions, which are based upon the geometric landmarks of a cube (vertices, edge centers, and face centers), are found to be suboptimal. For more than six encoding directions, many methods are able to generate a set of equivalent optimum encoding directions including the regular polyhedra, and the ME, MF and MV numerical optimization solutions. For seven directions, a previously described heuristic encoding scheme (tetrahedral plus x, y, z) was also found to be optimum. This study indicates that there is no significant advantage to using more than six encoding directions as long as an optimum encoding is used for six directions. Future DT‐MRI studies are necessary to validate these observations. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:769–780. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physical Properties of Crystals
(2007) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(07)70138-4 · Cited by 7,769
Physical properties of crystals
Catti, M. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573653.003.0010 · Cited by 3,068
Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy
Pierpaoli, C., & Basser, P. J. (1996) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910360612 · Cited by 2,405
Basser, P. J. (1995) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.1940080707 · Cited by 1,519
Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging
Jones, D. K., Horsfield, M. A., & Simmons, A. (1999) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199909)42:3<515::aid-mrm14>3.0.co;2-q · Cited by 1,403
Analysis of partial volume effects in diffusion‐tensor MRI
Alexander, A. L., Hasan, K. M., Lazar, M., Tsuruda, J. S., & Parker, D. L. (2001) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1105 · Cited by 695
Self-citationA simplified method to measure the diffusion tensor from seven MR images
Basser, P. J., & Pierpaoli, C. (1998) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910390610 · Cited by 583
Molecular diffusion, tissue microdynamics and microstructure
Bihan, D. L. (1995) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.1940080711 · Cited by 497
Multi-component apparent diffusion coefficients in human brain
Mulkern, R. V., Gudbjartsson, H., Westin, C.-F., Zengingonul, H. P., Gartner, W., Guttmann, C. R. G., Robertson, R. L., Kyriakos, W., Schwartz, R., Holtzman, D., et al. (1999) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1492(199902)12:1<51::aid-nbm546>3.0.co;2-e · Cited by 374
Shimony, J. S., McKinstry, R. C., Akbudak, E., Aronovitz, J. A., Snyder, A. Z., Lori, N. F., Cull, T. S., & Conturo, T. E. (1999) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.212.3.r99au51770 · Cited by 315
Cited by
Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain
Alexander, A. L., Lee, J. E., Lazar, M., & Field, A. S. (2007) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.nurt.2007.05.011 · Cited by 2,747
Self-citationDiffusion tensor imaging and beyond
Tournier, J., Mori, S., & Leemans, A. (2011) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22924 · Cited by 921
Jones, D. K. (2004) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.20033 · Cited by 773
Diffusion-tensor imaging of white matter tracts in patients with cerebral neoplasm
Witwer, B. P., Moftakhar, R., Hasan, K. M., Deshmukh, P., Haughton, V., Field, A., Arfanakis, K., Noyes, J., Moritz, C. H., Meyerand, M. E., et al. (2002) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.2002.97.3.0568 · Cited by 431
Self-citationDiffusion-Tensor MR Imaging and Tractography: Exploring Brain Microstructure and Connectivity
Nucifora, P. G. P., Verma, R., Lee, S.-K., & Melhem, E. R. (2007) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2452060445 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Hasan, K. M., Parker, D. L., & Alexander, A. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04-23
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 769-780
- ISSN
- 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2586
- OpenAlex
- W2157766167
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of gradient encoding schemes for diffusion‐tensor MRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.1107
- The paper
- Hasan, K. M., Parker, D. L., & Alexander, A. L. (2001). Comparison of gradient encoding schemes for diffusion‐tensor MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.