Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 431

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diffusion-tensor imaging of white matter tracts in patients with cerebral neoplasm

Witwer, Brian P., Moftakhar, Roham, Hasan, Khader M., Deshmukh, Praveen, Haughton, Victor, Field, Aaron, Arfanakis, Konstantinos, Noyes, Jane, Moritz, Chad H., Meyerand, M. Elizabeth, Rowley, Howard A., Alexander, Andrew L., Badie, Behnam·2002·Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

Object. Preserving vital cerebral function while maximizing tumor resection is a principal goal in surgical neurooncology. Although functional magnetic resonance imaging has been useful in the localization of eloquent cerebral cortex, this method does not provide information about the white matter tracts that may be involved in invasive, intrinsic brain tumors. Recently, diffusion-tensor (DT) imaging techniques have been used to map white matter tracts in the normal brain. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the role of DT imaging in preoperative mapping of white matter tracts in relation to cerebral neoplasms. Methods. Nine patients with brain malignancies (one pilocytic astrocytoma, five oligodendrogliomas, one low-grade oligoastrocytoma, one Grade 4 astrocytoma, and one metastatic adenocarcinoma) underwent DT imaging examinations prior to tumor excision. Anatomical information about white matter tract location, orientation, and projections was obtained in every patient. Depending on the tumor type and location, evidence of white matter tract edema (two patients), infiltration (two patients), displacement (five patients), and disruption (two patients) could be assessed with the aid of DT imaging in each case. Conclusions. Diffusion-tensor imaging allowed for visualization of white matter tracts and was found to be beneficial in the surgical planning for patients with intrinsic brain tumors. The authors' experience with DT imaging indicates that anatomically intact fibers may be present in abnormal-appearing areas of the brain. Whether resection of these involved fibers results in subtle postoperative neurological deficits requires further systematic study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/jns.2002.97.3.0568

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 431

Metadata

Authors
Witwer, B. P., Moftakhar, R., Hasan, K. M., Deshmukh, P., Haughton, V., Field, A., Arfanakis, K., Noyes, J., Moritz, C. H., Meyerand, M. E., Rowley, H. A., Alexander, A. L., & Badie, B.
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
2002-09
Volume
97
Issue
3
Pages
568-575
ISSN
0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020048627
Cited by
431
References
28
FWCI
18.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffusion-tensor imaging of white matter tracts in patients with cerebral neoplasm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.2002.97.3.0568
The paper
Witwer, B. P., Moftakhar, R., Hasan, K. M., Deshmukh, P., Haughton, V., Field, A., Arfanakis, K., Noyes, J., Moritz, C. H., Meyerand, M. E., Rowley, H. A., Alexander, A. L., & Badie, B. (2002). Diffusion-tensor imaging of white matter tracts in patients with cerebral neoplasm. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2002.97.3.0568

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.