Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Susceptibility‐weighted imaging to visualize blood products and improve tumor contrast in the study of brain masses

Sehgal, Vivek, Delproposto, Zachary, Haddar, Djamel, Haacke, E. Mark, Sloan, Andrew E., Zamorano, Lucia J., Barger, Geoffery, Hu, Jiani, Xu, Yingbiao, Prabhakaran, Karthik Praveen, Elangovan, Ilaya R., Neelavalli, Jaladhar, Reichenbach, Jürgen R.·2006·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic value of susceptibility‐weighted imaging (SWI) for studying brain masses. Materials and Methods: SWI is a high‐resolution, three‐dimensional, fully velocity‐compensated gradient‐echo sequence that uses both magnitude and phase data. Custom postprocessing is applied to enhance the contrast in the magnitude images between tissues with different susceptibilities. This sequence was applied to 44 patients (24 males and 20 females, 15–89 years old, mean age = 50.3 years) with brain masses, pre‐ and/or postcontrast, and compared with conventional sequences (T1, T1 postcontrast, T2, proton density (PD), fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) at 1.5T). Correlation with pathology was obtained in 12 cases. All images were reviewed independently by three radiologists. Results: In the evaluation of tumor visibility, boundary definition, blood products, venous vasculature, architecture, and edema, SWI gave better information than the standard T1‐weighted postcontrast images in 11%, 14%, 71%, 73%, 63%, and 75% of the data, respectively, in a subgroup of 38 patients. This demonstrates that the information presented by SWI is complementary in nature to that available from conventional methods. On the whole, SWI was much more sensitive for showing blood products and venous vasculature. SWI showed a useful FLAIR‐like contrast and complemented the information obtained by conventional T1 postcontrast sequences regarding the internal architecture of the lesions. Good pathologic correlations were found for blood products as predicted by SWI. Conclusion: SWI should prove useful for tumor characterization because of its ability to better highlight blood products and venous vasculature and reveal new internal architecture. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmri.20598

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Sehgal, V., Delproposto, Z., Haddar, D., Haacke, E. M., Sloan, A. E., Zamorano, L. J., Barger, G., Hu, J., Xu, Y., Prabhakaran, K. P., Elangovan, I. R., Neelavalli, J., & Reichenbach, J. R.
Venue
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-05
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
41-51
ISSN
  • 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2586
OpenAlex
W1984036240
Cited by
204
References
1
FWCI
11.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Susceptibility‐weighted imaging to visualize blood products and improve tumor contrast in the study of brain masses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.20598
The paper
Sehgal, V., Delproposto, Z., Haddar, D., Haacke, E. M., Sloan, A. E., Zamorano, L. J., Barger, G., Hu, J., Xu, Y., Prabhakaran, K. P., Elangovan, I. R., Neelavalli, J., & Reichenbach, J. R. (2006). Susceptibility‐weighted imaging to visualize blood products and improve tumor contrast in the study of brain masses. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20598

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.