Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: Comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade

Open access
Tamada, Tsutomu, Sone, Teruki, Jo, Yoshimasa, Toshimitsu, Shinya, Yamashita, Takenori, Yamamoto, Akira, Tanimoto, Daigo, Ito, Katsuyoshi·2008·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for discriminating tumor in patients with prostate cancer from normal prostatic tissues in healthy adult men, and to identify correlations between ADC and histologic grade of prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 125 healthy male volunteers (mean age, 60 years; range, 50–86 years) and 90 prostate cancer patients (mean age, 71 years; range, 51–88 years) underwent diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) of the prostate with a single‐shot echo‐planar imaging sequence using b‐factors of 0 and 800 sec/mm 2. ADC was measured from two locations in the peripheral zone (PZ) and two locations in the central gland (CG) in normal subjects, and tumor locations of PZ or transition zone (TZ) in patients with prostate cancer. Results: Mean ADC values of tumor regions in both PZ (1.02 ± 0.25 × 10−3 mm 2/sec) and TZ (0.94 ± 0.21 × 10−3 mm 2/sec) were significantly lower than those in the corresponding normal regions (1.80 ± 0.27 × 10−3 mm 2/sec and 1.34 ± 0.14 × 10−3 mm 2/sec, respectively) (P < 0.0001 each). Furthermore, a significant negative correlation was identified between ADC in PZ cancer and tumor Gleason score (ρ = −0.497, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: ADC values appear to provide acceptable diagnostic accuracy in both PZ and TZ. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:720–726. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmri.21503

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Tamada, T., Sone, T., Jo, Y., Toshimitsu, S., Yamashita, T., Yamamoto, A., Tanimoto, D., & Ito, K.
Venue
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
720-726
ISSN
  • 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2586
OpenAlex
W2115419491
Cited by
258
References
2
FWCI
13.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: Comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.21503
The paper
Tamada, T., Sone, T., Jo, Y., Toshimitsu, S., Yamashita, T., Yamamoto, A., Tanimoto, D., & Ito, K. (2008). Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: Comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21503

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.