The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: Comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To investigate the utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for discriminating tumor in patients with prostate cancer from normal prostatic tissues in healthy adult men, and to identify correlations between ADC and histologic grade of prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 125 healthy male volunteers (mean age, 60 years; range, 50–86 years) and 90 prostate cancer patients (mean age, 71 years; range, 51–88 years) underwent diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) of the prostate with a single‐shot echo‐planar imaging sequence using b‐factors of 0 and 800 sec/mm 2. ADC was measured from two locations in the peripheral zone (PZ) and two locations in the central gland (CG) in normal subjects, and tumor locations of PZ or transition zone (TZ) in patients with prostate cancer. Results: Mean ADC values of tumor regions in both PZ (1.02 ± 0.25 × 10−3 mm 2/sec) and TZ (0.94 ± 0.21 × 10−3 mm 2/sec) were significantly lower than those in the corresponding normal regions (1.80 ± 0.27 × 10−3 mm 2/sec and 1.34 ± 0.14 × 10−3 mm 2/sec, respectively) (P < 0.0001 each). Furthermore, a significant negative correlation was identified between ADC in PZ cancer and tumor Gleason score (ρ = −0.497, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: ADC values appear to provide acceptable diagnostic accuracy in both PZ and TZ. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:720–726. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Le Bihan, D., Breton, E., Lallemand, D., Grenier, P., Cabanis, E., & Laval-Jeantet, M. (1986) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763909 · Cited by 3,912
Effects of cell volume fraction changes on apparent diffusion in human cells
Anderson, A. W., Xie, J., Pizzonia, J., Bronen, R. A., Spencer, D. D., & Gore, J. C. (2000) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/s0730-725x(00)00147-8 · Cited by 176
Cited by
Prostate Cancer: Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection, Localization, and Staging
Hoeks, C. M. A., Barentsz, J. O., Hambrock, T., Yakar, D., Somford, D. M., Heijmink, S. W. T. P. J., Scheenen, T. W. J., Vos, P. C., Huisman, H., van Oort, I. M., et al. (2011) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.11091822 · Cited by 677
Hambrock, T., Somford, D. M., Huisman, H. J., van Oort, I. M., Witjes, J. A., Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, C. A., Scheenen, T., & Barentsz, J. O. (2011) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.11091409 · Cited by 572
Turkbey, B., Shah, V. P., Pang, Y., Bernardo, M., Xu, S., Kruecker, J., Locklin, J., Baccala, A. A., Rastinehad, A. R., Merino, M. J., et al. (2011) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.10100667 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Tamada, T., Sone, T., Jo, Y., Toshimitsu, S., Yamashita, T., Yamamoto, A., Tanimoto, D., & Ito, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 720-726
- ISSN
- 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2586
- OpenAlex
- W2115419491
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: Comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.21503
- The paper
- Tamada, T., Sone, T., Jo, Y., Toshimitsu, S., Yamashita, T., Yamamoto, A., Tanimoto, D., & Ito, K. (2008). Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: Comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21503
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.