Cited by 117Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchReproductive tract infections researchHead and Neck Cancer Studies

Detection of multiple human papillomavirus types in the lower genital tract correlates with cervical dysplasia

Fife, Kenneth H., Cramer, Harvey M., Schroeder, Jill M., Brown, Darron R.·2001·Journal of Medical Virology

Abstract

Some human papillomavirus (HPV) types, such as HPV 16, are clearly associated with cervical dysplasia; however, the role played by other HPV types occasionally found in dysplasia is less certain. In addition, most methods used to detect HPV in clinical specimens cannot easily distinguish among more than two or three HPV types in a single specimen. Therefore, the significance of infection with multiple HPV types is not known. To address this question, we analyzed cervicovaginal lavage specimens from three cohorts of women for HPV DNA using a PCR/reverse blot assay system that permits the detection and partial quantitation of 26 genital HPV types. As expected, 94.1% of women who had dysplasia (n = 34) and 71.4% of women who had atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance (ASCUS) (n = 21) on cytology had HPV DNA detected compared to 54.5% of age matched women with normal cytology. HPV 16 DNA was detected in 35% of dysplasia patients compared to 9% of cytologic normals (P = 0.0044). Dysplasia patients had a mean of 3.29 (range 0-10) different HPV types detected compared to 1.04 (range 0-7) HPV types among those with normal cytology (P < 0.0001). These data support a possible role for multiple HPV types in the development or progression of cervical dysplasia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmv.1085

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fife, K. H., Cramer, H. M., Schroeder, J. M., & Brown, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Darron R.
Venue
Journal of Medical Virology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-07-13
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
550-559
ISSN
  • 0146-6615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9071
OpenAlex
W2152727873
Cited by
117
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Virology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI 31494)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Keywords
human papillomavirus, multiple HPV types, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, HPV16, atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance, cervicovaginal lavage, HPV testing, lower genital tract infection, cervical cancer progression
MeSH terms
Adult, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Cervix Uteri, DNA, Viral, Epithelial Cells, Female, Humans, Therapeutic Irrigation, Middle Aged, Tumor Virus Infections, Vagina, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review