Cited by 266Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Developmental and cell type‐specific expression of the neuronal marker NeuN in the murine cerebellum

Weyer, Anja, Schilling, Karl·2003·Journal of Neuroscience Research

Abstract

NeuN is a 46/48‐kD nuclear protein antigen used widely to identify postmitotic neurons in both research and diagnostics. It is expressed by neurons throughout the nervous system of a variety of species, including birds, rodents, and man (Mullen et al. [1992] Development 116:201–211). When we sought to use NeuN to follow the developmental progression of murine cerebellar interneurons, we observed that expression of this antigen in the cerebellum was restricted to granule neurons and a small population of cells present in the lower molecular layer of the adult cerebellum. In an attempt to identify these cells, we combined immunostaining for NeuN with a panel of cell type‐specific markers to unambiguously identify neurons that express NeuN in the adult and developing cerebellum. In contrast to postmitotic granule neurons, NeuN was not expressed by any other immunocytochemically identified cerebellar interneurons, which comprised basket and stellate cells, Golgi neurons, unipolar brush cells, and Lugaro cells. NeuN‐positive cells in the molecular layer failed to express any cell type‐specific markers tested. They may represent ectopic granule cells; alternatively, they may represent a hitherto unknown population of cerebellar cells. In vitro experiments suggest that NeuN expression is related closely to granule cell axogenesis. This approach also revealed that the level of NeuN expression could be modulated by chronically depolarizing these cells. Thus, whereas NeuN expression per se is a reliable marker of proliferative capacity, levels of NeuN expression may also be indicative of the physiological status of a postmitotic neuron. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jnr.10655

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weyer, A., & Schilling, K.
Affiliations
University of Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Schilling, Karl
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-05-23
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
400-409
ISSN
  • 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4547
OpenAlex
W2090875715
Cited by
266
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
NeuN, cerebellum, granule neurons, cerebellar interneurons, neuronal development, cell type-specific markers, basket cells, stellate cells, unipolar brush cells, molecular layer, ectopic granule cells, axogenesis, depolarization, postmitotic neurons
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Division, Cells, Cultured, Cerebellar Cortex, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C3H, Neurons, Pregnancy, Biomarkers, Cell Lineage, Antigens, Nuclear, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review