Acute morphine administration increases extracellular DA levels in the rat lateral septum by decreasing the GABAergic inhibitory tone in the ventral tegmental area
Open accessAbstract
We studied the effect of an acute systemic administration of morphine and of a local intra-ventral tegmental area (VTA) infusion of the same drug on extracellular levels of dopamine (DA) in the lateral septum (LS) by in vivo microdialysis in anesthetized rats. The extracellular levels of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) were also measured in all dialysate samples. The acute systemic administration of morphine dose-dependently increased extracellular levels of DA but not of 5-HT in the LS, in the absence or presence of fluoxetine. This morphine effect was antagonized by the previous administration of naloxone, a specific opioid antagonist. The local infusion of morphine in the VTA also induced a significant increase of the extracellular levels of DA in the LS, concomitantly with a decrease of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) extracellular levels in the VTA itself. Intriguingly, the LS extracellular levels of DA returned to basal values before the VTA GABA extracellular levels recovered. Our results show for the first time that an acute administration of morphine increases DA extracellular levels in the LS. The results also suggest that DA cells in the VTA and innervating the LS are under an inhibitory GABAergic tone sensitive to morphine. Taken together, our neurochemical data and previous studies involving LS DA in stress-related behavior support the hypothesis that DA in the LS plays a significant role in addictive behavior. The participation of LS DA and 5-HT systems in stress-indu…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Increased extracellular LS-DA release has been observed in response to systemic application of cocaine in rats and morphine in mice.
“Increased extracellular LS-DA release has been observed in response to systemic application of drugs of abuse such as cocaine in rats and morphine in mice [32,33]”
From Involvement of dopamine, but not norepinephrine, in the sex-specific regulation of juvenile socially rewarding behavior by vasopressin (2018) · cites this paper as [33]
Cites
A PHA-L analysis of ascending projections of the dorsal raphe nucleus in the rat
Vertes, R. P. (1991) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903130409 · Cited by 842 · see citing works
McBride, W. J., Murphy, J. M., & Ikemoto, S. (1999) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00022-4 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Pothos, E., Rada, P., Mark, G. P., & Hoebel, B. G. (1991) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(91)91724-f · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Increased probability of GABA release during withdrawal from morphine
Bonci, A., & Williams, J. T. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-02-00796.1997 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare
Boissy, A., Manteuffel, G., Jensen, M. B., Moe, R. O., Spruijt, B., Keeling, L. J., Winckler, C., Forkman, B., Dimitrov, I., Langbein, J., et al. (2007) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003 · Cited by 1,486 · see citing works
Bredewold, R., Nascimento, N. F., Ro, G. S., Cieslewski, S. E., Reppucci, C. J., & Veenema, A. H. (2018) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-018-0100-2 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sotomayor, R., Forray, M. I., & Gysling, K.
- Affiliations
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
- Corresponding author
- Gysling, Katia
- ORCID
- Gysling, Katia
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 132-139
- ISSN
- 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4547
- OpenAlex
- W2036921667
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- americanae.aecid.es
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Universidad de Chile
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- morphine, dopamine, lateral septum, ventral tegmental area, GABAergic inhibition, extracellular dopamine, serotonin, opioid antagonism, naloxone, fluoxetine, drug addiction, stress-induced relapse, drug-seeking behavior
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Animals, Dopamine, Drug Administration Schedule, Fluoxetine, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Male, Morphine, Naloxone, Narcotic Antagonists, Narcotics, Neural Inhibition, Neural Pathways, Serotonin, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Microdialysis, Ventral Tegmental Area, Statistics, Nonparametric, Septum of Brain, Extracellular Fluid, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review