Cited by 150Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsCancer Treatment and PharmacologyNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Microtubule dynamics in axons and dendrites

Baas, P. W., Slaughter, T., Brown, A., Black, M. M.·1991·Journal of Neuroscience Research

Abstract

We have investigated the stability, α‐tubulin composition, and polarity orientation of microtubules (MTs) in the axons and dendrites of cultured sympathetic neurons. MT stability was evaluated in terms of sensitivity to nocodazole, a potent anti‐MT drug. Nocodazole sensitivity was assayed by quantifying the loss of MT polymer as a function of time in 2 μg/ml of the drug. MTs in the axon and the dendrite exhibit striking similarities in their drug sensitivity. In both types of neurites, the kinetics of MT loss are biphasic, and are consistent with the existence of two types of MT polymer that depolymerize with half‐times of ≈︁3.5 min and ≈︁130 min. We define the more rapidly depolymerizing polymer as drug‐labile and the more slowly depolymerizing polymer as drug‐stable. The proportion of MT polymer that is drug‐stable is greater in axons (58%) than in dendrites (25%). On the basis of current understanding of the mechanism of action of nocodazole, we suggest that the drug‐labile and drug‐stable polymer observed in both axons and dendrites correspond to two distinct types of polymer that differ in their relative rates of turnover in vivo. In a previous study, we established that in the axon, these drug‐stable and drug‐labile types of MT polymer exist in the form of distinct domains on individual MTs, with the labile domain situated at the plus end of the stable domain (Baas and Black, J Cell Biol 111:495–509, 1990). Because of the great difference in drug sensitivity between the drug‐labile and drug‐stable MT polymer, we were able to dissect them apart by appropriate treatments with nocodazole. This permitted us to evaluate the drug‐labile and drug‐stable polymer in terms of polarity orientation and relative content of α‐tubulin variants generated by posttranslational detyrosination or acetylation. In both the axon and the dendrite, the modified as well as unmodified α‐tubulins are present in both drug‐labile and drug‐stable polymer, but at different levels. Specifically, the modified forms of α‐tubulin are enriched in the drug‐stable MT polymer compared to the drug‐labile MT polymer. In studies on MT polarity orientation, we demonstrate that in axons, MTs are uniformly plus‐end‐distal, whereas in dendrites, MTs are non‐uniform in their polarity orientation, with roughly equal levels of the MTs having each orientation. We also demonstrate that both drug‐stable and drug‐labile polymer are incorporated into MTs of both polarity orientations in the dendrite.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jnr.490300115

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two models have been proposed to explain microtubule stability in axons: one suggests centrally located microtubules are generally more stable while peripheral ones are more dynamic, and the other suggests intra-microtubule heterogeneity with alternating domains of differing stability.

    “Two models have been proposed to explain microtubule stability in axons: one suggests that centrally located microtubules are generally more stable while peripheral ones are more dynamic53–55, and the other model suggests intra-microtubule heterogeneity, in which individual microtubules contain alternating domains with differing stability56,57.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baas, P. W., Slaughter, T., Brown, A., & Black, M. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
  • Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Baas, P. W.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-09
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
134-153
ISSN
  • 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4547
OpenAlex
W2131954429
Cited by
150
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS23530, NS-28785, R01NS023530)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
microtubule dynamics, axons, dendrites, sympathetic neurons, microtubule stability, alpha-tubulin, post-translational modification, detyrosination, acetylation, microtubule polarity, microtubule turnover, neurite morphology, microtubule-associated proteins, MAP2, tau protein
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Axons, Cells, Cultured, Dendrites, Ganglia, Sympathetic, Kinetics, Microscopy, Electron, Microtubules, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Tubulin, Nocodazole, Cell Polarity, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review