The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A theory‐based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace
Open accessAbstract
Conflict management influences individual wellbeing, group performance and organizational effectiveness. This research examined the psychometric qualities of two versions of the newly developed test for conflict handling. The lean version (Study 1 and 2) included problem solving, forcing, yielding and avoiding as distinct conflict management strategies, and the expanded version (Study 3) also included compromising. A negotiation study (Study 1) showed substantial convergence between self‐reports, opponent‐reports and observer rated behavior for problem solving, forcing and yielding, but not for avoiding. In Study 2 and Study 3 the psychometric properties were examined of the lean and the expanded version, respectively. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed good to excellent psychometric qualities of both versions of the scale. We conclude that the scale is a parsimonious, flexible and valid instrument to assess conflict management strategies at work. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling: Fourth Edition
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315749105 · Cited by 6,604
“Positive effects of conflict: insights from social cognition,”
Baron, R. A. (1997) · Using Conflict in Organizations · doi:10.4135/9781446217016.n13 · Cited by 33
Cited by
Dunlop, P. D., & Lee, K. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.243 · Cited by 543
Steenbeek, R., Schellart, A. J., Mulders, H., Anema, J. R., Kroneman, H., & Besseling, J. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-1 · Cited by 420
An Introduction to Bayesian Hypothesis Testing for Management Research
Andraszewicz, S., Scheibehenne, B., Rieskamp, J., Grasman, R., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314560412 · Cited by 344
Wisdom, bias, and balance: Toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition.
Brienza, J. P., Kung, F. Y. H., Santos, H. C., Bobocel, D. R., & Grossmann, I. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000171 · Cited by 235
A Systematic Social Observation Study of Police De-Escalation Tactics
Todak, N., & James, L. (2018) · Police Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1098611118784007 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- De Dreu, C. K. W., Evers, A., Beersma, B., Kluwer, E. S., & Nauta, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-08-17
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 645-668
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2117469208
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 25.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A theory‐based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.107
- The paper
- De Dreu, C. K. W., Evers, A., Beersma, B., Kluwer, E. S., & Nauta, A. (2001). A theory‐based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
