The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The many benefits of employee well‐being in organizational research
Abstract
Summary: We undertake three objectives in this Incubator . We begin with a discussion of how well‐being has been considered in organizational research. Second, we provide an overview of the relationship between employee well‐being and such workplace outcomes as job performance, employee retention, and cardiovascular health. Third, we introduce exciting research directions. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Employees are more likely to develop a trusting relationship with their leader and organization when they perceive competence by the organization in dealing with the challenges (Pfeffer, 2018; Wright & Huang, 2012).”
From Fostering Employee Trust via Effective Supervisory Communication during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Through the Lens of Motivating Language Theory (2022) · cites this paper as Wright & Huang, 2012
Citations
Cites
Assessing Subjective Well-Being: Progress and Opportunities
Diener, E. (1994) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf01207052 · Cited by 2,317
Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job performance.
Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (2000) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.84 · Cited by 1,451
Self-citationJob Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being as Nonadditive Predictors of Workplace Turnover
Wright, T. A., & Bonett, D. G. (2007) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206306297582 · Cited by 781
Self-citationAffect and Managerial Performance: A Test of the Sadder-but-Wiser vs. Happier-and-Smarter Hypotheses
Staw, B. M., & Barsade, S. G. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393415 · Cited by 700
Wellbeing—The Five Essential Elements
Krüger, S. (2010) · Applied Research in Quality of Life · doi:10.1007/s11482-010-9127-1 · Cited by 335
Preventive stress management in organizations
Quick, J. C., Wright, T. A., Adkins, J. A., Nelson, D. L., & Quick, J. D. (2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-3366 · Cited by 300
Self-citationEmotional Awareness and Emotional Intelligence in Leadership Teaching
Ashkanasy, N. M., & Dasborough, M. T. (2003) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832320309599082 · Cited by 177
The effect of turnover on work satisfaction and mental health: Support for a situational perspective
Wright, T. A., & Bonett, D. G. (1992) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030130606 · Cited by 84
Self-citationThe role of character in ethical leadership research
Wright, T. A., & Quick, J. C. (2011) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.015 · Cited by 83
Self-citationThe role of employee psychological well‐being in cardiovascular health: when the twain shall meet
Wright, T. A., Cropanzano, R., Bonett, D. G., & Diamond, W. J. (2009) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.592 · Cited by 73
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Roethlisberger F. J., 1939, Management and the worker
- Russell B., 1930, The conquest of happiness
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ho, H., & Kuvaas, B. (2019) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21990 · Cited by 288
Workplace spirituality and employee well-being: an empirical examination
Pawar, B. S. (2016) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-11-2015-0215 · Cited by 184
Service ecosystem well-being: conceptualization and implications for theory and practice
Frow, P., McColl‐Kennedy, J. R., Payne, A., & Govind, R. (2019) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-07-2018-0465 · Cited by 161
Flow at Work and Basic Psychological Needs: Effects on Well‐Being
Ilieș, R., Wagner, D. T., Wilson, K. S., Ceja, L., Johnson, M. D., DeRue, S., & Ilgen, D. (2016) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12075 · Cited by 167
Qin, Y. S., & Men, L. R. (2022) · International Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/23294884221081838 · Cited by 173
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, T. A., & Huang, C.
- Affiliations
- Fordham University (US)
- Guangdong Nianjie Security Technology Co., Ltd Guangzhou City Guangdong Province China
- Corresponding author
- Wright, Thomas A.
- ORCID
- Wright, Thomas A.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-08-30
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1188-1192
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W1493418994
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Keywords
- employee well-being, employee performance, employee retention, cardiovascular health, workplace outcomes, organizational analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review