The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: a theoretical integration
Abstract
Although organizational support theory and psychological contract theory both stress social exchange processes in the establishment and maintenance of the employee–employer relationship, they have focused on different aspects of this relationship. We suggest that, far from being independent, the different parts of the employee–employer association considered by the two theories are mutually interdependent. Further, key processes identified by each theory influence the relationships described by the other theory. To further the understanding of the employee–employer relationship, we provide an integrated account that emphasizes the interdependence of perceived organizational support and the psychological contract. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023 · cited 9×
“OST maintains that POS is cultivated through favorable treatment received from the organization (Eisenberger et al., 1986; Shore & Shore, 1995; Rhoades & Eisenberger, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationRethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3 · Cited by 5,758
Rousseau, D. M. (1990) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030110506 · Cited by 1,811
Cited by
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909 · Cited by 2,606
Perceived organizational support: a meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory.
Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206315575554 · Cited by 2,354
Self-citationShanock, L. R., & Eisenberger, R. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.689 · Cited by 1,096
Self-citationShanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4 · Cited by 1,000
Examining the Impact of Servant Leadership on Sales Force Performance
Jaramillo, F., Grisaffe, D. B., Chonko, L. B., & Roberts, J. A. (2009) · Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management · doi:10.2753/pss0885-3134290304 · Cited by 219
Suazo, M. M. (2009) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940910928856 · Cited by 210
Training is an investment with return in temporary workers: A social exchange perspective
José Chambel, M., & Sobral, F. (2011) · Career Development International · doi:10.1108/13620431111115613 · Cited by 98
Liu, J., Cho, S., & Putra, E. D. (2017) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-10-2015-0539 · Cited by 77
What Factors Do Really Influence the Level of Technostress in Organizations?: An Empirical Study
Koo, C., & Wati, Y. (2011) · Studies in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19953-0_34 · Cited by 25
Yang, F.-C., Kao, R.-H., & Cho, C.-C. (2019) · Policing: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/pijpsm-07-2018-0086 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Aselage, J., & Eisenberger, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 491-509
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2047116740
- Cited by
- 986
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
