What Factors Do Really Influence the Level of Technostress in Organizations?: An Empirical Study
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individual factors like techno-affinity, techno-efficacy, age, gender, and resistance to IT-induced change can influence individuals' appraisal of digital technology as a stressor and moderate its impacts.
“Previous studies identify individual factors like techno-affinity and techno-efficacy, age, gender, and resistance to ITinduced change (Koo and Wati 2011;Shu et al. 2011)”
From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Koo and Wati 2011
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,588 · see citing works
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,406 · see citing works
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1205
(1999) · Industrial Robot the international journal of robotics research and application · doi:10.1108/ir.1999.04926fae.001 · Cited by 39,228 · see citing works
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,557 · see citing works
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975 · see citing works
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J. F., Gurdon, M. A., Jick, T. D., Petit, A., Stern, R. N., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,947 · see citing works
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136319 · Cited by 7,791 · cited 1× · see citing works
“the impact that societies have on their members [28].”
BackgroundComputer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249688 · Cited by 6,553 · see citing works
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 · Cited by 6,479 · see citing works
Hietala, M. (1983) · Scandinavian Journal of History · doi:10.1080/03468758308579015 · Cited by 6,232 · see citing works
Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249689 · Cited by 6,006 · see citing works
How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses
Chin, W. W. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29 · Cited by 5,398 · see citing works
Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling
Chin, W. W. (1998) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/290231.290235 · Cited by 4,579 · see citing works
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299806200303 · Cited by 3,971 · see citing works
Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?
Barney, J. B. (1986) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1986.4306261 · Cited by 3,891 · see citing works
Handbook of Partial Least Squares
Vinzi, V. E., Chin, W. W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8 · Cited by 3,850 · see citing works
Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0165 · Cited by 2,060 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Research by Ragu-Nathan et al. [ 5 ] has proven that technostress has negative impact on job satisfaction, commitment to organization, and intention to stay.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251742 · Cited by 1,660 · see citing works
Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017 · Cited by 1,511 · see citing works
Task complexity: Definition of the construct
Wood, R. E. (1986) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(86)90044-0 · Cited by 1,393 · see citing works
Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies
Mick, D. G., & Fournier, S. M. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209531 · Cited by 1,308 · see citing works
Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: a theoretical integration
Aselage, J., & Eisenberger, R. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.211 · Cited by 987 · see citing works
Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaptation1
Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneault, A. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148693 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
Ahuja, M. K., & Bennett, J. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148691 · Cited by 818 · see citing works
Technostress: The Human Cost Of The Computer Revolution
Brod, C. (1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 791 · see citing works
Brancheau, J. C., & Wetherbe, J. C. (1990) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1.2.115 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
The Effects of Presentation Formats and Task Complexity on Online Consumers’ Product Understanding1
Jiang, & Benbasat, I. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148804 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Technostress under different organizational environments: An empirical investigation
Wang, K., Shu, Q., & Tu, Q. (2008) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.007 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Has the Internet become indispensable?
Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T., & Venkatesh, A. (2004) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1005817.1005818 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Technological stress: Psychophysiological symptoms in modern offices
Arnetz, B. B., & Wiholm, C. (1997) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(97)00083-4 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
(2020) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003072430 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
The Effects of Presentation Formats and Task Complexity on Online Consumers’ Product Understanding
Jiang, Z. J. (2007) · National University of Singapore · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Organizational-level interventions to reduce occupational stressors
Burke, R. J. (1993) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678379308257051 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Burke, M. S. (2008) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2008.06.008 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Wang, K., & Shu, Q. (2008) · International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA) · doi:10.1109/dexa.2008.67 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Dueling or the battle royale? The impact of task complexity on the evaluation of entry threat
Klemz, B. R., & Gruca, T. S. (2003) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.10106 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Improving End-User Satisfaction Through Techno-Stress Prevention: Some Empirical Evidences
Tu, Q., Tarafdar, M., Ragu‐Nathan, T. S., & Ragu-Nathan, B. S. (2008) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Train Right or Don't Train at All.
Napier, N. K., & Deller, J. R. (1985) · Training and development journal · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Definition, symptoms and risk of techno-stress: a systematic review
La Torre, G., Esposito, A., Sciarra, I., & Chiappetta, M. (2019) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s00420-018-1352-1 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Berg-Beckhoff, G., Nielsen, G., & Ladekjær Larsen, E. (2017) · International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1080/10773525.2018.1436015 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Technostress Research: A Nurturing Ground for Measurement Pluralism?
University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Fischer, T., Riedl, R., & University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria and University of Linz (2017) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.04017 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Analyzing the evolution of technostress: A science mapping approach
Salazar-Concha, C., Ficapal-Cusí, P., Boada-Grau, J., & Camacho, L. J. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06726 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review
Rademaker, T., Klingenberg, I., & Süß, S. (2025) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-023-00385-x · Cited by 59 · see citing works
- Authors
- Koo, C., & Wati, Y.
- Affiliations
- Chosun University (KR)
- ORCID
- Koo, Chulmo
- Venue
- Studies in Computational Intelligence
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2011
- Pages
- 339-348
- ISSN
- 1860-949X (ISSN-L)
- 1860-9503
- OpenAlex
- W196272588
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in computational intelligence (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Keywords
- technostress, innovation culture, self-efficacy, task complexity, information and communication technologies, moderating effect, occupational stress, organizational technology use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review