Cited by 464Team Dynamics and PerformanceGender Diversity and InequalitySocial and Intergroup Psychology

Diversity and team outcomes: the moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity

Open access
Schippers, Michaéla C., Den Hartog, Deanne N., Koopman, Paul L., Wienk, Janique A.·2003·Journal of Organizational Behavior

Abstract

Reflexivity—the extent to which teams reflect upon and modify their functioning—has been identified as a possible key factor in the effectiveness of work teams. We examined the extent to which team composition affected team process (i.e., reflexivity) and in turn team outcomes (i.e., satisfaction, commitment, and performance). The results of diversity research thus far have been inconclusive in terms of positive or negative effects of team composition on team process and outcomes. In the current research, group longevity and outcome interdependence were expected to moderate the relationship between diversity on the one hand and reflexivity and team outcomes on the other hand. Reflexivity was expected to mediate these interaction effects. The current field study was conducted among 54 work teams from 13 different organizations. As predicted, few main effects were found. Instead, analyses showed interaction effects of diversity and outcome interdependence on the measures of reflexivity, satisfaction, and performance. As predicted, interaction effects were also found for diversity and group longevity on the measures of reflexivity, satisfaction, and performance. Three‐way interactions were found for satisfaction and commitment. Also, reflexivity was shown to mediate these relationships, indicating that the moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity on the relation between diversity and team outcomes are due to the effects on process. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/job.220

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teams are more likely to engage in thorough information elaboration when team members are more open to different information.

    “Another stream of research has shown that teams are more likely to engage in thorough information elaboration when team members are more open to different information (Homan et al., 2008;Kearney, Gebert, & Voelpel, 2009;Schippers, Den Hartog, Koopman, & Wienk, 2003).”

    From Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. (2020) · cites this paper as Schippers, Den Hartog, Koopman, & Wienk, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & Wienk, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Schippers, Michaéla C.
Venue
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-08-12
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
779-802
ISSN
  • 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1379
OpenAlex
W2138437782
Cited by
464
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 30
FWCI
8.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Erasmus+
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
team diversity, team composition, reflexivity, outcome interdependence, group longevity, team outcomes, team satisfaction, team commitment, team performance, work teams, team processes, moderation, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review