The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The structure of work values: A cross cultural comparison
Abstract
Several years ago a research project on work values was originated. The study strived to examine the relative importance of work value items and to analyze the structure of the domain for samples from various cultural environments. A facet definition of work values was suggested that provided guidelines for constructing the Work Values Questionnaire and the formulation of hypotheses regarding the structure of relationships among components of work values. Based on data collected from 2280 respondents in eight countries the hypotheses were tested by means of Guttman's Smallest Space Analysis. The results support the hypotheses. An empirical double‐ordered conceptual system, a radex structure, was obtained in each of the samples reflecting the facets of the definition: modality of outcome — cognitive, affective and instrumental, and system ‐ performance contingency — reward, resource. In terms of the issue of cultural differences the results indicate the presence of cultural differences in the rating of a limited number of specific values. These differences are only minor variations within a much broader pattern of structural similarity. The fact that essentially the same structure was obtained in eight independent samples lends substantial support to the definitional framework of work values suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1997) · Naming the Mind: How Psychology Found its Language · doi:10.4135/9781446221815.n7 · Cited by 15,148
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
Sorge, A., & Hofstede, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393017 · Cited by 15,062
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,235
(1964) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,439
(1973) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,144
Kline, P. (1993) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90054-7 · Cited by 8,744
Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5278 · Cited by 5,339
McClelland, D. C. (1961) · doi:10.1037/14359-000 · Cited by 4,998
Toward a universal psychological structure of human values.
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.53.3.550 · Cited by 3,790
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
McCalister, D. V., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1967) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575337 · Cited by 2,214
Managerial Attitudes and Performance.
Alderfer, C. P., Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391269 · Cited by 2,209
Guttman, L. (1968) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02290164 · Cited by 1,343
Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology.
Kanfer, R. (1990) · Cited by 1,308
Existence, Relatedness, and Growth: Human Needs in Organizational Settings.
Guterman, S. S., & Alderfer, C. P. (1974) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2063565 · Cited by 1,003
Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology
West, R. (1983) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(83)90138-1 · Cited by 695
Expectations and Actions: Expectancy-Value Models in Psychology
Feather, N. T. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003150879 · Cited by 693
Managerial Attitudes and Performance.
Kumnick, M. D., Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1969) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2521994 · Cited by 625
Form, W. H., Rosenberg, M., Suchman, E. A., & Goldsen, R. K. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089066 · Cited by 426
Structure of human values: Testing the adequacy of the Rokeach Value Survey.
Braithwaite, V. A., & Law, H. G. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.49.1.250 · Cited by 416
Trucco, E. (1955) · The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics · doi:10.1007/bf02477861 · Cited by 403
Facets of work values: A structural analysis of work outcomes.
Elizur, D. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.69.3.379 · Cited by 391
Self-citationTheory Construction and Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences.
Cohen, B. P., & Shye, S. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2066281 · Cited by 386
A Programmatic Approach to Studying the Industrial Environment and Mental Health1
French, J. R. P., & Kahn, R. L. (1962) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1962.tb00415.x · Cited by 314
Instrumentality theory of work motivation: Some experimental results and suggested modifications.
Graen, G. (1969) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027100 · Cited by 270
Value: Behavioral Decision Theory
Becker, G. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1967) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.18.020167.001323 · Cited by 207
The Work Ethic: Working Values and Values That Work.
Bowie, N. E., & Cherrington, D. J. (1982) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2522687 · Cited by 193
Lawful Roles of Facets in Social Theories
Levy, S. (1985) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5042-5_3 · Cited by 156
A Structural Theory For Intergroup Beliefs and Action
Guttman, L. (1959) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089380 · Cited by 155
Smallest space analysis of intelligence and achievement tests.
Schlesinger, I. M., & Guttman, L. (1969) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026868 · Cited by 149
Dyer, L., & Parker, D. F. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076914 · Cited by 142
The Structure of Attitudes Toward Work and Technological Change Within an Organization
Elizur, D., & Guttman, L. (1976) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391719 · Cited by 131
Self-citationValues as second-order needs in the theory of work adjustment
Lofquist, L. H., & Dawis, R. (1978) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/0001-8791(78)90003-9 · Cited by 113
Organizational Goals and Expected Behavior of American Managers.
England, G. W. (1967) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/254630 · Cited by 102
“What Is Not What” in Theory Construction
Guttman, L. (1982) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-333060-4.50019-x · Cited by 90
Multidimensional scaling: Some possibilities for counseling psychology.
Fitzgerald, L. F., & Hubert, L. J. (1987) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0167.34.4.469 · Cited by 72
Shapira, Z., & Zevulun, E. (1979) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(79)90007-2 · Cited by 41
DIMENSIONS OF WORK OUTCOMES: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING APPROACH
Billings, R. S., & Cornelius, E. T. (1980) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1980.tb02169.x · Cited by 33
Elizur, D. (1979) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167900300210 · Cited by 28
Self-citationA systems view of job satisfaction.
Wernimont, P. F. (1972) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0032665 · Cited by 25
Elizur, D., & Shye, S. (1976) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872677602900105 · Cited by 11
Self-citation
Cited by
Gursoy, D., Maier, T. A., & Chi, C. G. (2008) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.11.002 · Cited by 720
Yousef, D. A. (2001) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/00483480110380325 · Cited by 512
Silverthorne, C. (2004) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/01437730410561477 · Cited by 498
Brown, D. (2002) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00165.x · Cited by 395
Stevens, R., Moray, N., & Bruneel, J. (2015) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12091 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Elizur, D., Borg, I., Hunt, R., & Beck, I. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-38
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2085550668
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 5.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
