The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational career development is not dead: a case study on managing the new career during organizational change
Abstract
New forms of careers have received increased attention in contemporary organizational research. A prominent focus in this research has been whether and how, in an increasingly unpredictable career environment, individuals are taking responsibility for their own career development. The implication is that career is becoming less central to organizational management practices. At the same time there is evidence that organizational changes typically described in this literature (such as delayering the organization in a quest for flexibility) have had a negative impact on career progress, resulting in resistance to change. The implication here is that career concerns are more central to organizational management practices. This in‐depth qualitative case study examines whether individuals do in fact take more responsibility for their career development during times of organizational change. We also examine whether this does indeed mean that the organization takes less responsibility for career management. Our data indicate that individuals are, in fact, taking more responsibility for their own careers. At the same time we found that the organization in our case study also became more actively involved in career development and management. However, this active approach did not resemble traditional top‐down career management and development. To us, the pattern of organizational and individual career development actions appear to constitute a kind of ‘organizational dance,’ a highly interactive mutual influence process, in which both parties are at once the agent and the target of career influence. Strengths and limitations of the study are discussed, as are directions for future research. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychological Success and the Boundary less Career
Mirvis, P. H., & Hall, D. T. (1996) · The Boundaryless Career · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195100143.003.0014 · Cited by 100
Self-citation
Cited by
A Fresh Look at the Dark Side of Contemporary Careers: Toward a Realistic Discourse
Baruch, Y., & Vardi, Y. (2016) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12107 · Cited by 195
Employees' satisfaction with retention factors: exploring the role of career adaptability
Coetzee, M., & Stoltz, E. (2015) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2015.04.012 · Cited by 136
The work of cultural transition: an emerging model
Ryba, T. V., Stambulova, N. B., & Ronkainen, N. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00427 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Lips‐Wiersma, M., & Hall, D. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 771-792
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2148262017
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational career development is not dead: a case study on managing the new career during organizational change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.446
- The paper
- Lips‐Wiersma, M., & Hall, D. T. (2007). Organizational career development is not dead: a case study on managing the new career during organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.446
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.