Cited by 136Career Development and DiversityJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorHuman Resource and Talent Management

Employees' satisfaction with retention factors: exploring the role of career adaptability

Coetzee, Melinde, Stoltz, Elleen·2015·Journal of Vocational Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.04.012

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coetzee, M., & Stoltz, E.
Affiliations
University of South Africa (ZA)
Corresponding author
Coetzee, Melinde
Venue
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
89
Pages
83-91
ISSN
0001-8791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W577695916
Cited by
136
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
33.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Vocational Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
Keywords
career adaptability, employee retention, career concerns, job satisfaction, work-life balance, career opportunities, job characteristics, racial differences, automotive industry workers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review